crex 03 September 2006 09:38:57

It's raining cats and dogs here ...

crex 03 September 2006 09:10:44

No wonder the databas grumples

Paul Beuk 03 September 2006 08:28:29

We crossed the 500,000 unique visits limit last night!

dipdip 02 September 2006 19:03:02

I see and now the date to the pic of Paragus didn't come along: 13.5.06. Important for ID

Paul Beuk 02 September 2006 16:26:22

Hehe, there are three now. Itwas the first one before you resubmitted (see the time of my shout).

dipdip 02 September 2006 15:16:06

There are 3: male dorsal, male dorsolateral, female. which one?

Paul Beuk 02 September 2006 07:10:06

dipdip: upload of Dasysyrphus picture failed.

jorgemotalmeida 01 September 2006 22:29:08

here we still see yet lots of hoverflies.

crex 01 September 2006 20:16:06

The hoverflies seems lost now when almost all wild flower is gone ...

Dmitry Gavryushin 01 September 2006 15:52:23

2 jorgemotalmeida: yes u can ajust size/quality ratio, but some quality loss is inevitable since JPEG format implies compression anyway and more advanced formats r not directly supported by popular we

crex 01 September 2006 15:51:19

Large size pix (specially width) ruin the layout and forces the viewer to scrol. No good. In FAQ says max 600px width.

jorgemotalmeida 01 September 2006 15:36:41

to get big images it's easy. Save for web option - no crop is necessary in this way - and there is a bar that enables us to save a much more bigger image but image suffer a little.

jorgemotalmeida 01 September 2006 15:29:01

crex. English could trigger these things. Like Portuguese. Yes, big images, they use I think jpg very compressed without lost any initial quality.

crex 01 September 2006 15:14:54

I mentioned big, but I didn't mean great ... I was refering to pixels.

jorgemotalmeida 01 September 2006 14:08:04

found another great gallery with so crisp images: http://www.pbase.com/ceru
men/flies

Nikita Vikhrev 01 September 2006 13:36:50

572=573 But it is Paul, who decided to add two images instead of one, I send

Nikita Vikhrev 01 September 2006 13:36:06

572=573 But it is Paul, how decided to add two images instead of one, I send

jorgemotalmeida 01 September 2006 13:18:59

/agree, crex. Great photos recently in diptera! Specially the new fly family here. ehe Thanks, Black! I will seek for more them. Hungry for flies.

jorgemotalmeida 01 September 2006 13:16:26

By maths, no. )) joke. Which 572,573 photos??

crex 01 September 2006 13:01:55

Is photo 572 same as 573?