Diptera.info :: Family forums :: Syrphidae
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Pelecocera to ID
|
|
| Rui Andrade |
Posted on 18-01-2017 17:58
|
 Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
Is it possible to identify the species? Is there any key to the species of the genus? location: Vila do Conde, Portugal date: 17/01/2017 Rui Andrade attached the following image:  [101.17Kb] |
 |
|
| Rui Andrade |
Posted on 18-01-2017 17:59
|
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
.
Rui Andrade attached the following image:  [132.02Kb] |
|
|
|
| Fred Fly |
Posted on 18-01-2017 20:02
|
|
Member Location: Germany Posts: 392 Joined: 19.07.11 |
Dear Rui, there is a quite recent (2015) revision of the genus Pelecocera available in the net. Unfortunately this is not working on your specimen which is belonging to Chamaesyrphus. Regards Piet |
|
|
|
| Rui Andrade |
Posted on 18-01-2017 20:40
|
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
Thank you Piet! In the checklist of Syrphidae from Portugal Chamaesyrphus lusitanicus is placed in Pelecocera so I was not sure if I should call this fly Pelecocera or Chamaesyrphus. And is there a key for Chamaesyrphus? |
|
|
|
| Piluca_Alvarez |
Posted on 19-01-2017 11:13
|
 Member Location: Madrid, Spain Posts: 2431 Joined: 06.11.10 |
As far as I know, Chamaesyrphus is placed in Pelecocera in recent literature and it is considered a subgenus within Pelecocera. You can download the paper where this is shown here: https://www.resea...characters But yes, as Piet says, the recent work by Ximo only covers the 'real' Pelecocera: https://www.zfmk....cera_0.pdf I also need an updated key of Chamaesyrphus. I would be very grateful if somebody can provide it  Thanks in advance!  |
|
|
|
| Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-01-2017 15:24
|
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
Thank you, Piluca. |
|
|
|
| Piluca_Alvarez |
Posted on 19-01-2017 17:45
|
|
Member Location: Madrid, Spain Posts: 2431 Joined: 06.11.10 |
A pleasure, Rui |
|
|
|
| Gerard Pennards |
Posted on 21-01-2017 13:40
|
 Member Location: Amersfoort Posts: 1914 Joined: 07.06.04 |
According to Andre van Eck it should be Chamaesyrphus pruinosomaculatus....
Greetings, Gerard Pennards |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
