Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Calliphoridae? => Calliphora cf. uralensis
|
|
RamiP |
Posted on 17-08-2016 20:07
|
Member Location: Posts: 5612 Joined: 25.04.15 |
17.8.16 in Jyväskylä, Finland
RamiP attached the following image: [66.22Kb] Edited by RamiP on 19-08-2016 09:19 |
Stephane Lebrun |
Posted on 17-08-2016 22:36
|
Member Location: Le Havre, France Posts: 8248 Joined: 03.03.07 |
Calliphora sp.
Stephane. |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 18-08-2016 07:21
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18546 Joined: 21.07.04 |
But it looks odd, doesn't it ? Basicosta is black, it is clearly not vomitoria. Calypter is dark. So should be something like C. loewi ? Theo |
|
|
RamiP |
Posted on 18-08-2016 08:15
|
Member Location: Posts: 5612 Joined: 25.04.15 |
Thanks for both Rami |
Stephane Lebrun |
Posted on 18-08-2016 19:06
|
Member Location: Le Havre, France Posts: 8248 Joined: 03.03.07 |
Personally, I'd prefer Calliphora uralensis (no dark stripe between prac, abdomen without shifting markings, face seems orange etc.).
Edited by Stephane Lebrun on 18-08-2016 19:07 Stephane. |
|
|
RamiP |
Posted on 18-08-2016 19:47
|
Member Location: Posts: 5612 Joined: 25.04.15 |
What should I do Only sp. or... Rami |
Stephane Lebrun |
Posted on 18-08-2016 21:33
|
Member Location: Le Havre, France Posts: 8248 Joined: 03.03.07 |
I first wrote "sp." because I can't make a certified ID. So Calliphora sp. is the safer, and Calliphora cf. uralensis is a bit bolder.
Stephane. |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 19-08-2016 08:03
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18546 Joined: 21.07.04 |
with ' something like loewi' I included uralensis as well. The apparent lack of markings of abdomen is conspicuous, though it is very tricky to establish this feature just from one angle. Still, I wanted the record not to go down as simply ' spec.' , it is an interesting record: safe to say it is either uralensis or loewi. I will check my collection, I should have both. Theo |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 19-08-2016 09:09
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18546 Joined: 21.07.04 |
So, I checked my collection, and I have to totally agree with Stephane I'd favour uralensis based on * lack of white dusting on abdomen * calypter infuscated till margin, at least so it seems * lack of central dark vitta between prea ACR. However * one depends on angle of view * two is difficult to see * three can only be judged properly when seen from behind. the head shape seems to be in between loewi and uralensis. So, I'd favour uralensis, but it is by no means sure, at least to me. Theo |
|
|
RamiP |
Posted on 19-08-2016 09:18
|
Member Location: Posts: 5612 Joined: 25.04.15 |
Thanks for you both, masters Rami |
Jump to Forum: |