Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 44

· Members Online: 1
Oryctes

· Total Members: 4,988
· Newest Member: DedeLab
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· OryctesOnline
· weia00:15:10
· Tony Irwin00:24:11
· Alexandru Pi...00:30:56
· Carnifex00:38:41
· John Carr01:09:48
· Volker01:24:29
· libor01:25:23
· guplox02:00:53
· Double A02:07:28
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Family forums :: Syrphidae
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Xanthogramma dives or stackelbergi female?
Ruth Ahlburg
#1 Print Post
Posted on 23-07-2014 20:27
Member

Location: Denmark
Posts: 419
Joined: 26.09.07

Copenhagen, Denmark, june 12, 2012.
Referring to this articke http://www.entomohelvetica.ch/pdf/ausgabe3/139_145_Spight_BUCH.pdf X. dives is acceptet as a separate species different from X. stackelbergi (and pedissequum).

The tip of the forewings ar darkened/infuscated, and the shape of the median, Black longitudinal stripe on frons indicate X. dives.

I called it X. stackelbergi because the staus of X. dives as a separate species was still uncertain in the Sweedish "nationalnycken" I used.

Thanks in adwance
Ruth Ahlburg attached the following image:


[143.18Kb]
Ruth Ahlburg
Denmark
 
ValerioW
#2 Print Post
Posted on 23-07-2014 20:40
User Avatar

Member

Location: Padova - Italy
Posts: 982
Joined: 01.06.12

Right, dives female
Edited by ValerioW on 23-07-2014 20:52
 
ValerioW
#3 Print Post
Posted on 23-07-2014 20:51
User Avatar

Member

Location: Padova - Italy
Posts: 982
Joined: 01.06.12

I would say, considering the country, dives/pedissequum . dives appears restricted to italy.
 
Ruth Ahlburg
#4 Print Post
Posted on 23-07-2014 21:23
Member

Location: Denmark
Posts: 419
Joined: 26.09.07

ValerioW wrote:
I would say, considering the country, dives/pedissequum . dives appears restricted to italy.


The abdominal membrane between each tergite and sternite is entirely yellow, except for between tergite and sternite 1 and tergite and sternite 2, where there is a broad,distinct, dark-grey band.
This make X. pedissequum impossible, as I understand it.

According to the Swiss article in the link neither X. stackelbergi nor pedissequum have darkened vingtips.
Ruth Ahlburg
Denmark
 
ValerioW
#5 Print Post
Posted on 23-07-2014 21:58
User Avatar

Member

Location: Padova - Italy
Posts: 982
Joined: 01.06.12

'Impossible' is a great word, too big for this still debated issue. dives should have darkened wing tips, as your specimen has.
 
Fred Fly
#6 Print Post
Posted on 23-07-2014 22:23
Member

Location: Germany
Posts: 395
Joined: 19.07.11

Its a female of X. dives which is quite commune in Central Europe.
 
ValerioW
#7 Print Post
Posted on 24-07-2014 08:21
User Avatar

Member

Location: Padova - Italy
Posts: 982
Joined: 01.06.12

Piet Nord wrote:
Its a female of X. dives which is quite commune in Central Europe.



That it matches with (latest, not old, that didn't mention wing tip's darkening) dives ' descriptions is smooth and clear. Matter is that officially dives is only in the checklist of non-insular Italy, and for sure not in Germany or Netherlands or Denmark. Why there's a similar gap? I think that this "wing's apex darkened" Xanthogramma stackelbergi/pedissequum like is widespread, but there's no consensus yet about its detachment from the other two. Anyways, considering its particular traits (hind leg, wing's apex etc.), it appears to have dignity as independent species.
Edited by ValerioW on 24-07-2014 08:32
 
ValerioW
#8 Print Post
Posted on 24-07-2014 08:27
User Avatar

Member

Location: Padova - Italy
Posts: 982
Joined: 01.06.12

Ruth, I just noticed that this photo was already in the diptera.info gallery. And I also see you put another dives/stackelbergi in the gallery, which actually cannot be fixed, considering an unchecked wing.
 
Ruth Ahlburg
#9 Print Post
Posted on 24-07-2014 13:59
Member

Location: Denmark
Posts: 419
Joined: 26.09.07

Yes, the male is discussed in this thread http://www.diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=7&thread_id=32554&pid=145396#post_145396.

A slight darkening on t´he wing-tip
Ruth Ahlburg
Denmark
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Ectophasia crassipennis female? Diptera (adults) 2 25-11-2024 06:03
Scathophagidae - Scathophaga ... (female) Diptera (adults) 6 19-11-2024 19:09
Mycetophilidae female id help Diptera (adults) 1 08-11-2024 03:10
Culicidae -> Culex pipiens, female Diptera (adults) 6 27-10-2024 11:49
Muscidae: Limnophora riparia female Diptera (adults) 4 18-10-2024 19:54
Date and time
27 November 2024 17:38
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

08.11.24 16:10
Www.abebooks.com

29.07.24 13:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 11:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 12:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 15:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 13:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 13:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 11:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 08:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 21:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

Render time: 1.36 seconds | 205,055,899 unique visits