Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 5

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,337
· Newest Member: Maik Hausotte
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Tony Irwin00:35:35
· Melodi00:59:15
· Maks S01:08:32
· John Carr01:29:25
· albrej01:48:58
· Marion Fried...01:50:15
· Rosevinge1502:22:25
· Leif Bloss C...02:25:52
· PhilC02:26:11
· Nosferatumyia02:29:32
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Family forums :: Syrphidae
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Syrphid? --> Scaeva selenitica? Or Scaeva dignota?
undina-bird
#1 Print Post
Posted on 23-06-2011 00:33
Member

Location: Russian Fed., St. Petersburg
Posts: 7
Joined: 22.06.11

Hello all,
Pls help to ID this hoverfly.

Date: June 17, 2011
Location: 30 km south of St. Petersburg, Russian Fed.
Habitat: garden
Thanks!
undina-bird attached the following image:


[186.97Kb]
Edited by undina-bird on 23-06-2011 06:56
 
http://undina-bird.ru
Stephen R
#2 Print Post
Posted on 23-06-2011 00:40
User Avatar

Member

Location: Clitheroe Lancashire UK
Posts: 2378
Joined: 12.06.09

I think it is Scaeva selenitica (female)
 
undina-bird
#3 Print Post
Posted on 23-06-2011 00:48
Member

Location: Russian Fed., St. Petersburg
Posts: 7
Joined: 22.06.11

Stephen R, thank you!
 
http://undina-bird.ru
blowave
#4 Print Post
Posted on 23-06-2011 03:46
User Avatar

Member

Location: LINCOLN, UK
Posts: 3151
Joined: 27.06.07

The spots look to reach the lateral margins, that would make it Scaeva dignota?

Janet
http://cubits.org...
 
http://cubits.org/buglife/
undina-bird
#5 Print Post
Posted on 23-06-2011 07:19
Member

Location: Russian Fed., St. Petersburg
Posts: 7
Joined: 22.06.11

blowave, thank you for the opinion! I have no keys for Diptera, I don't see much difference between the two and now I really don't know... Is it important that on all photos of Scaeva dignota I found, dignotas have completely or almost completely light-yellow abdominal side of the body (while the one on my photo has large black spots on it)?http://denbourge.free.fr/Insectes_diptera_syrphidae_Scaeva_dignota.htm
http://www.galerie-insecte.org/galerie/pays-29-syrphidae.html
http://www.diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=12115&pid=57203
http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php?photo=45782
(I understand that some may have mistakes, of course...)
 
http://undina-bird.ru
blowave
#6 Print Post
Posted on 23-06-2011 14:33
User Avatar

Member

Location: LINCOLN, UK
Posts: 3151
Joined: 27.06.07

Mark van Veen keys doesn't mention yellow at the edges of the abdomen for S. dignota.

S. selenitica spots do not reach the sides where for S dignota they normally do reach the margins.

Search for Scaeva dignota on this site, many other sites are not reliable.

You might post this in the syrphidae forum where it will get the attention of syrphidae experts.
http://cubits.org...
 
http://cubits.org/buglife/
undina-bird
#7 Print Post
Posted on 25-06-2011 02:15
Member

Location: Russian Fed., St. Petersburg
Posts: 7
Joined: 22.06.11

Thank you!
 
http://undina-bird.ru
Stephen R
#8 Print Post
Posted on 28-06-2011 14:41
User Avatar

Member

Location: Clitheroe Lancashire UK
Posts: 2378
Joined: 12.06.09

It seems to me that the spots do not quite reach the edge of the tergites - there is a black line beyond them. According to Fauna Eur. S. dignota should not be found around St. Petersburg. Perhaps an expert will help Smile

Stephen.
 
blowave
#9 Print Post
Posted on 28-06-2011 14:46
User Avatar

Member

Location: LINCOLN, UK
Posts: 3151
Joined: 27.06.07

It's really quite difficult to tell if the spots do or don't reach the margin.

I wonder if undina-bird could post a closer crop of the pic viewing from the top? The angle from underneath might be giving a false impression.

I think if it could be seen for sure an expert might have replied by now.
http://cubits.org...
 
http://cubits.org/buglife/
undina-bird
#10 Print Post
Posted on 28-06-2011 22:46
Member

Location: Russian Fed., St. Petersburg
Posts: 7
Joined: 22.06.11

> I wonder if undina-bird could post a closer crop of the pic viewing from the top? The angle from underneath might be giving a false impression.

This one the most "from the top" view I've got. Here is original size. Hope this helps.Smile
There are black lines, though very thin ones?

Unfortunately, there is no S.dignota in the gallery on this site to compare, only S.selenitica http://www.diptera.info/photogallery.php?album_id=49&rowstart=780
Identified as Scaeva dignota http://www.diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=7&thread_id=12115
undina-bird attached the following image:


[154.37Kb]
 
http://undina-bird.ru
blowave
#11 Print Post
Posted on 28-06-2011 23:01
User Avatar

Member

Location: LINCOLN, UK
Posts: 3151
Joined: 27.06.07

The spots certainly look to reach the side margins to me!

Look at these..

http://diptera.in...ost_126629

http://diptera.in...post_50398

undina-bird, you can make the links clickable by highlighting the link then click on the icon at the bottom of the post which is a circle with an arrow. Smile
http://cubits.org...
 
http://cubits.org/buglife/
Menno Reemer
#12 Print Post
Posted on 29-06-2011 10:13
Member

Location:
Posts: 338
Joined: 10.06.04

In certain specimens of S. selenitica the yellow maculae also reach the side margin, so the character is not reliable for distinguishing these species. It can only be used as a first indication: in S. dignota they always reach the side margin, in S. selenitica only in some specimens.
While males can be quite easily distinguished by the angle between the eyes on the frons, distinguishing thhe females is much harder. You need to take measurements of the width of the face relative to the width of the head, in frontal view.
I'm afraid this is not possible with these pictures. My gut feeling, for what it's worth, says this is S. selenitica...
 
undina-bird
#13 Print Post
Posted on 30-06-2011 20:28
Member

Location: Russian Fed., St. Petersburg
Posts: 7
Joined: 22.06.11

Thank you very much to all! Smile

Menno Reemer, that's right, I don't have frontal view. Thus, let it be Scaeva selenitica.
 
http://undina-bird.ru
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Another syrphid from Buenos Aires Syrphidae 2 30-11-2019 00:48
Ichneumonid from Syrphid pupa Other insects, spiders, etc. 1 24-09-2019 22:33
Ichneumonid from Syrphid pupa Other insects, spiders, etc. 1 24-09-2019 22:23
Syrphidae ID. >Scaeva pyrastri Syrphidae 7 06-09-2019 12:14
Syrphidae: Is this Scaeva pyrastri ? -> YES! Syrphidae 4 13-08-2019 21:41
Date and time
12 December 2019 01:55
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

04.12.19 10:23
Thx! TumbsUp

04.12.19 09:33
There are some internal issues withy their servers and they are working on it.

02.12.19 08:42
Anyone knows what happened with the Catalog of Fossil Diptera at the bishopmuseum.org webpage? Cannot access it Frown

01.11.19 22:46
Hi! may I ask, why the soldierfly banner (https://www.dipte
ra.info/images/sol
dierfly-banner.png
) is so big (4790x870 Pixels, 1, 4 M Cool? It always lasts minutes to load on a slow connection and costs a

18.09.19 20:06
Jewell699, you should post it in the forum, not submit it for the gallery.

15.09.19 20:41
Jewelm699 - did you upload it to a forum (which one?) or the gallery? I can't find it.

11.09.19 13:15
I’m hoping someone can identify the phoridae maggot or pupae I just uploaded.

28.08.19 14:29
Rafael p is legs and f1 is fore femur

26.08.19 17:13
If you experienced a very sluggish site recently, it may have been because someone tried to upload a maliciuous script by force. It appears to have failed. The visitor was blocked further access.

25.07.19 15:13
@Paul Beuk Thanks mate!! Best wishes!

Render time: 5.92 seconds | 143,018,312 unique visits