Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
 6011480 Drosphiid
|
|
| robirdman |
Posted on 23-08-2006 06:10
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 126 Joined: 18.08.05 |
Ryerson CA, IL 8-14-06 on fungus.
robirdman attached the following image:  [123.05Kb] |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 23-08-2006 06:30
|
 Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19403 Joined: 11.05.04 |
A species of Drosophila but I cannot say which one.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
 |
|
| robirdman |
Posted on 23-08-2006 14:29
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 126 Joined: 18.08.05 |
Thanks, Would other views, such as top help? I have several. |
|
|
|
| crex |
Posted on 23-08-2006 14:33
|
 Member Location: Sweden Posts: 1996 Joined: 22.05.06 |
May I ask what 6011480 stands for? I understand it can't be a date or even photo file number, unless you have taken more than 6 000 000 photos  |
|
|
|
| robirdman |
Posted on 24-08-2006 08:03
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 126 Joined: 18.08.05 |
When I shot film I used a code that was a combination of the roll number and frame number. So frame 35 on roll 2034 would have the number 203436. I kept notes on all the settings and correlated with the code. When I later got more and advanced cameras that recorded the data that I could just download to the computer, then I needed to separate the separate data streams, so I put a one in front of this number so not to confuse and get duplicate numbers. eg 1203436. I was actually using 3 cameras at the time and had some other prefix number for the third. When I started using digital cameras, I again needed to keep the numbers separate so they would never overlap. with a Fuji I gave a prefix of 4, d70 was 5 and d200 is 6. So starting with the first shot of the d200 it would be 6000001, and I am now up to 6012793. Currently I have less than 120,000 images, and so it unlikely that the numbers from different cameras will ever overlap. |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |