Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Psychodidae male, E-HU, Aug 2009 > Panimerus goetghebueri
|
|
pwalter |
Posted on 30-01-2010 18:36
|
Member Location: Miskolc, Hungary Posts: 3555 Joined: 06.11.08 |
Hi, in August I found two similar black Psychodids by a brook with black scales. They could be the sae species. Around 2 mms, by a small slow brook. This is the first one:
pwalter attached the following image: [82.23Kb] Edited by pwalter on 30-01-2010 22:26 |
|
|
pwalter |
Posted on 30-01-2010 18:38
|
Member Location: Miskolc, Hungary Posts: 3555 Joined: 06.11.08 |
I have 2 pictures of terminalia, antnna is broken off.
pwalter attached the following image: [78.57Kb] Edited by pwalter on 30-01-2010 18:39 |
|
|
pwalter |
Posted on 30-01-2010 18:39
|
Member Location: Miskolc, Hungary Posts: 3555 Joined: 06.11.08 |
3
pwalter attached the following image: [77.37Kb] |
|
|
pwalter |
Posted on 30-01-2010 18:40
|
Member Location: Miskolc, Hungary Posts: 3555 Joined: 06.11.08 |
The second specimen had antenna:
pwalter attached the following image: [24.06Kb] |
|
|
pwalter |
Posted on 30-01-2010 18:40
|
Member Location: Miskolc, Hungary Posts: 3555 Joined: 06.11.08 |
Second specimen:
pwalter attached the following image: [79.39Kb] |
|
|
pwalter |
Posted on 30-01-2010 18:41
|
Member Location: Miskolc, Hungary Posts: 3555 Joined: 06.11.08 |
Also second specimen:
pwalter attached the following image: [82.93Kb] |
|
|
phil withers |
Posted on 30-01-2010 19:48
|
Member Location: Lyon, France Posts: 521 Joined: 04.03.08 |
Telmatoscopus goetghebueri |
|
|
pwalter |
Posted on 30-01-2010 21:50
|
Member Location: Miskolc, Hungary Posts: 3555 Joined: 06.11.08 |
Thank You, found it under Panimerus |
|
|
Gunnar M Kvifte |
Posted on 30-01-2010 22:57
|
Member Location: Kassel, Germany Posts: 436 Joined: 18.08.09 |
A lot of advances were made in Psychodidae systematics in the 70s and 80s, but much of this work was problematic. Vaillant's work in Lindners "Die Fliegen der Palearktischen Region" was for instance not in concordance with the ICZN. Other works were impractical or lacked sufficient data to back it up, and as a consequence the nomenclature and higher classification of the group has remained controversial ever since. The controversy is annoying, because it is almost exclusively about conventions and formalities. The actual science behind it is nowhere as controversial. |
|
|
pwalter |
Posted on 01-02-2010 21:25
|
Member Location: Miskolc, Hungary Posts: 3555 Joined: 06.11.08 |
Thank You Gunnar, meanwhile, I have acces to my HDD, here's the animal:
pwalter attached the following image: [98.76Kb] Edited by pwalter on 01-02-2010 21:25 |
|
Jump to Forum: |