Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Tachinidae
|
|
neprisikiski |
Posted on 29-11-2009 18:30
|
Member Location: Lithuania Posts: 876 Joined: 23.02.09 |
I attach here probably Phryxe erythrostoma. Thanks for help.
neprisikiski attached the following image: [123.19Kb] Edited by neprisikiski on 29-11-2009 18:48 Erikas |
|
|
neprisikiski |
Posted on 29-11-2009 18:32
|
Member Location: Lithuania Posts: 876 Joined: 23.02.09 |
wing...
neprisikiski attached the following image: [191.26Kb] Erikas |
|
|
ChrisR |
Posted on 30-11-2009 10:01
|
Administrator Location: Reading, England Posts: 7699 Joined: 12.07.04 |
Have you got a photo of the fore tarsus and an overall shot of the whole fly?
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London. |
neprisikiski |
Posted on 30-11-2009 14:47
|
Member Location: Lithuania Posts: 876 Joined: 23.02.09 |
it is female, so I didnt made photo of the fore tarsus
neprisikiski attached the following image: [138.59Kb] Edited by neprisikiski on 30-11-2009 17:12 Erikas |
|
|
Jaakko |
Posted on 30-11-2009 19:20
|
Member Location: Joensuu, Finland Posts: 479 Joined: 04.08.08 |
To me the facial bristles rise too high for a Phryxe. If it is a Phryxe, I'm afraid it will be impossible to determine with certainty (a female). As it has black palps, it can be Nilea rufiscutellaris, however then it should have 4st. |
|
|
neprisikiski |
Posted on 30-11-2009 20:08
|
Member Location: Lithuania Posts: 876 Joined: 23.02.09 |
dear Jaakko, it has indeed 4st, but you can see two reclinate orbitals on the head, while middle tibia has at least five anterodorsals, that is why it cannot be Nilea and there are broken discals on the abdominal tergites. My guess about P. erythrostoma is based on narrow parafacialia and short VI costal section.
Erikas |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 01-12-2009 22:06
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18534 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Let me start with a simple question; the scutellar apical don't seem to be erect, do they ? Theo |
|
|
neprisikiski |
Posted on 01-12-2009 22:21
|
Member Location: Lithuania Posts: 876 Joined: 23.02.09 |
dear Theo, apicals are either not erect, or they are broken, that happens..
Erikas |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 03-12-2009 21:12
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18534 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Ah, that explains why I don't see them. In my experience, I prefer to ID erythrostoma on males. The females are more bristly on tergites in general, the outer orbital seta tends to be stronger than in outer Phryxe and yes, the wing venation definitely suggests erythrostoma. So you are likely to be right, but I am not the one to confirm it for 100 % Theo |
|
|
neprisikiski |
Posted on 03-12-2009 23:16
|
Member Location: Lithuania Posts: 876 Joined: 23.02.09 |
Thank you for commenting
Erikas |
|
Jump to Forum: |