Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 39

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,985
· Newest Member: Jogvan F
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· RamiP00:42:56
· nowaytofly01:10:41
· evdb01:16:30
· ESant01:44:45
· Jan Maca01:48:00
· Tony Irwin01:48:03
· smol02:03:06
· weia03:16:43
· Reimund Ley04:40:28
· marotta05:53:39
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
All blue Calliphorid (Oct-23)
Juergen Peters
#1 Print Post
Posted on 24-10-2008 02:14
User Avatar

Member

Location: northwest Germany
Posts: 13846
Joined: 11.09.04

Hello!

This one from yesterday afternoon at the forest (northwest Germany) leaves me a little bit confused: not that small (8-9 mm), but no Calliphora. The only idea I have is Protophormia terraenovae. But isn't that a spring species?


Larger pictures:
http://www.foto-u..._2_big.jpg
http://www.foto-u..._3_big.jpg
Juergen Peters attached the following image:


[72.56Kb]
Edited by Juergen Peters on 24-10-2008 02:14
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Juergen Peters
#2 Print Post
Posted on 24-10-2008 02:15
User Avatar

Member

Location: northwest Germany
Posts: 13846
Joined: 11.09.04

Pic #2
Juergen Peters attached the following image:


[73.93Kb]
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Juergen Peters
#3 Print Post
Posted on 24-10-2008 02:15
User Avatar

Member

Location: northwest Germany
Posts: 13846
Joined: 11.09.04

Pic #3
Juergen Peters attached the following image:


[65.05Kb]
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Roger Thomason
#4 Print Post
Posted on 24-10-2008 04:29
User Avatar

Member

Location: Mossbank,Shetland Isles.
Posts: 5254
Joined: 17.07.08

Looks similar to one I posted on 4th Oct.,which was ID'd as Protocalliphora sp. possibly azurea. But I'm probably wrong
as usual. Frown
Regards Roger
 
Gordon
#5 Print Post
Posted on 24-10-2008 05:28
User Avatar

Member

Location: Lake Kerkini, Greece
Posts: 1099
Joined: 02.01.08

Dear Juergen,
I would like to ask, why the three photos here? The first is not as clear as the second and nothing additional is shown in the third, while I accept that you have a right to show off your photography, I have a slow connection and I pay for my it by the kilobyte. The number of posts recently, that I have looked into (not just this one of yours but I have not spoken before) that have had three or four photos where one would have sufficed is quite frustrating.

Gordon
Edited by Gordon on 24-10-2008 07:11
 
www.earthlife.net/  www.earthlife.net/bluemagpie/
Roger Thomason
#6 Print Post
Posted on 24-10-2008 06:25
User Avatar

Member

Location: Mossbank,Shetland Isles.
Posts: 5254
Joined: 17.07.08

Consider yourself ticked off. GrinGrinGrin
 
Juergen Peters
#7 Print Post
Posted on 24-10-2008 09:08
User Avatar

Member

Location: northwest Germany
Posts: 13846
Joined: 11.09.04

Hello, Gordon!

Gordon wrote:
Dear Juergen,
I would like to ask, why the three photos here? The first is not as clear as the second and nothing additional is shown in the third, while I accept that you have a right to show off your photography, I have a slow connection and I pay for my it by the kilobyte.


I am sorry. Originally on my PC the three pics were much more different in size, and different parts were sharp in each one, than they now appear here after resizing them to nearly the same size and compressing them to fit for the upload Frown. I always hope, there is one or another detail not recogizeable in one picture, but perhaps in the other. It's often difficult to choose the right pics (and the really large pics with more details I generally only post as links with filesize indication). I will try to do it better in the future...
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Zeegers
#8 Print Post
Posted on 24-10-2008 09:39
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 18739
Joined: 21.07.04

I'd encourage anyone to post all photos available. The poster cannot decide which is useful and which is not.
I;ve had the reversed situation often: the poster did not post the most relevant pic in the first posting. Very annoying in my opinion.

As for the fly, to me it is Protophormia as suggested by Juergen himself. This fly is very cold-resistant.


Theo
 
Philippe moniotte
#9 Print Post
Posted on 24-10-2008 13:31
User Avatar

Member

Location: Heron, Belgium
Posts: 860
Joined: 14.10.05

I'd suggest one way to compromise between the two concerns is to make a cut-and-paste of the three or four pictures into one. I've been doing that recently , keeping the width at 800 pixels and the size at about 150 Kb . I find that the quality is still acceptable for our purpose f the original is of reasonable resolution, and if it's not too googd, well... it does not get much worse. The main advantage is that you get all the pix in the same message, too. my tcw...
Philippe
 
Juergen Peters
#10 Print Post
Posted on 24-10-2008 19:25
User Avatar

Member

Location: northwest Germany
Posts: 13846
Joined: 11.09.04

Hello to all!

Thanks for your opinions and suggestions. I think, the format of a photo is less relevant (as long as it is not too wide for the screen size; I assume, most people use at least 1024x768 pixels) than the real file size. That can be reduced efficiently by setting the JPEG quality to 60% or lower in the photo editing program one uses. I additionally use an image compressing software, which is even more efficient, so the size of most of my pics is smaller than that of many untreated photos with a bigger resolution (depends on the complexity of the background etc., though). Therefore I would not favour a too low resolution restriction of posted photos, but rather a more limited filesize if necessary (195 KB I find very generous; in my own forum I have 100 KB for guests and 150 KB for registered users).


@Theo: thanks for confirmation of P. terraenovae.
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Gordon
#11 Print Post
Posted on 25-10-2008 08:05
User Avatar

Member

Location: Lake Kerkini, Greece
Posts: 1099
Joined: 02.01.08

Personally, I like the inset idea, I did notice that Phillipe or somebody else had done it and have since used it myself, only I set my pics to 600 pixels because this seems to fit the screen better. You can always post another photo if someasks for detail of the legs or something, if you have it.

I cannot be the only person on the list who does not live in the West, or a big city and cannot get a fast/broad band connection. My connection is through a mobile phone sort of gizmo and I pay 30 Euroes a month basic plus extra every time I exceed the bandwidth limit, my sister's family in the UK pay abot 13 Euroes a month for Broad band with no bandwidth limit, and no dropped connections at inconvenient times.

Ultimately the answer lies, from the posters point of view, in good photo quality and luck. I while back I posted a photo of a Cylindromia, I had a variety of reasonable photos, but it would not have mattered how many I posted, you can't do a genitalia dissection on a photo.

Gordon
 
www.earthlife.net/  www.earthlife.net/bluemagpie/
Zeegers
#12 Print Post
Posted on 25-10-2008 17:27
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 18739
Joined: 21.07.04

I can see the problem of Gordon, but I can't agree with the example Cylindryomyia.
This is a perfect example in which case nearly all species can be identified from photos, if all angles are represented !
No genitalia needed (at least: not in Europe).

So in my opinion the 'counterexample' actually illustrates my point.

Theo
 
Gordon
#13 Print Post
Posted on 25-10-2008 17:39
User Avatar

Member

Location: Lake Kerkini, Greece
Posts: 1099
Joined: 02.01.08

Sorry, I am only going on what I have been told. But not by anybody here I must add. Theo, would you like to have another look at my Cylindromia thread and tell me what else you need to see. I notice I am guilty of 2 images there already, oh well.

http://www.diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=16197
 
www.earthlife.net/  www.earthlife.net/bluemagpie/
Zeegers
#14 Print Post
Posted on 26-10-2008 14:39
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 18739
Joined: 21.07.04

I'd like to have a really good view of the scutellum and if possible of the ventral side of the abdomen.

An excellent pic of the antennae might help as well.

I didn't see it would be easy....


Theo
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Calliphorid with bluish green abdomen (29.09.24) --> Onesia cf. floralis (f) Diptera (adults) 6 04-10-2024 20:51
Dark grey Calliphorid (?) (29.09.24) Diptera (adults) 2 03-10-2024 20:51
Little, blue with black spots Diptera (adults) 3 13-08-2024 07:17
Sympycnus simplicipes?<-Doli, small with blue frons. Hercostomus? Diptera (adults) 4 12-12-2023 03:46
Blue Calliphoridae --> Melinda viridicyanea (f) Diptera (adults) 5 26-10-2023 20:44
Date and time
06 October 2024 18:15
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

29.07.24 14:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 12:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 13:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 16:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 14:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 14:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 12:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 09:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 22:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

27.12.22 22:10
Thanks, Jan Willem! Much appreciated. Grin

Render time: 1.90 seconds | 201,766,239 unique visits