Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Tachinidae (Prooppia nigripalpis)
|
|
christoophe |
Posted on 02-05-2010 09:48
|
![]() Member Location: France Provence Posts: 1959 Joined: 06.02.08 |
Hello Collected 1 05 10, size from 8 to 9 mm I think Exoristini. pic1 christoophe attached the following image: ![]() [84.5Kb] Edited by christoophe on 02-05-2012 12:45 |
|
|
christoophe |
Posted on 02-05-2010 09:48
|
![]() Member Location: France Provence Posts: 1959 Joined: 06.02.08 |
pic2
christoophe attached the following image: ![]() [57.92Kb] |
|
|
christoophe |
Posted on 02-05-2010 09:49
|
![]() Member Location: France Provence Posts: 1959 Joined: 06.02.08 |
pic3
christoophe attached the following image: ![]() [121.36Kb] |
|
|
christoophe |
Posted on 02-05-2010 09:49
|
![]() Member Location: France Provence Posts: 1959 Joined: 06.02.08 |
pic4
christoophe attached the following image: ![]() [127.41Kb] |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 04-05-2010 09:05
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18604 Joined: 21.07.04 |
? Parasetigena silvestris ? Theo |
|
|
christoophe |
Posted on 04-05-2010 11:57
|
![]() Member Location: France Provence Posts: 1959 Joined: 06.02.08 |
Yes, with 4 post dc, I thought of this genus, but later? Thank theo |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 04-05-2010 21:18
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18604 Joined: 21.07.04 |
It is a male, right ? The genitalia have those very characteristic fluffy hairs on it, if I remember correctly. Theo |
|
|
christoophe |
Posted on 14-05-2010 10:23
|
![]() Member Location: France Provence Posts: 1959 Joined: 06.02.08 |
Picture of another specimen than at the top from this post![]() Edited by christoophe on 14-05-2010 10:24 |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 15-05-2010 09:02
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18604 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Yes, that is it ! Theo |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 01-05-2012 16:13
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18604 Joined: 21.07.04 |
The prae-alar bristle is strong, missed that before. So Christophe suggested Prooppia nigripalpis. Given the narrow vertex and the erect scutellar apicals, that seems right. Thanks, Christophe. Theo |
|
Jump to Forum: |