Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Ephydridae, Hydrellia ? from Romania
|
|
| cosmln |
Posted on 05-10-2007 21:46
|
 Member Location: Romania Posts: 956 Joined: 18.03.07 |
Hi, another fly collected. when collecting i was thinking to Opomizidae but now i don't know what to say.... but i hope to receive an answer here  in 28.september.2007 collecting when sweeping with net thru vegetation. size little more than 2mm. photo taken thru microscope. cosmln [EDIT]: title changed cosmln attached the following image:  [78.2Kb] Edited by cosmln on 05-10-2007 22:34 |
 |
|
| Tony Irwin |
Posted on 05-10-2007 22:00
|
 Member Location: Norwich, England Posts: 7196 Joined: 19.11.04 |
Hydrellia (Ephydridae)
Tony ---------- Tony Irwin |
|
|
|
| cosmln |
Posted on 05-10-2007 22:08
|
|
Member Location: Romania Posts: 956 Joined: 18.03.07 |
Tony Irwin wrote: Hydrellia (Ephydridae) thanks Tony. was a similar one last days (first thinking from the author was Dolichopodidae... if remember well). now looking thru the gallery this is very a like Nikita's fly with the ID Hydrellia griseola.... maybe is the same? cosmln Edited by cosmln on 05-10-2007 22:08 |
|
|
|
| Tony Irwin |
Posted on 06-10-2007 00:11
|
|
Member Location: Norwich, England Posts: 7196 Joined: 19.11.04 |
Could be - Hydrellia griseola is a very common fly of grassland - the larva is a leaf miner in a wide variety of plants.
Tony ---------- Tony Irwin |
|
|
|
| Kahis |
Posted on 06-10-2007 00:41
|
 Member Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 1999 Joined: 02.09.04 |
Hydrellia griseola is by far the most common species - but there are many other, similar species. It is still a rather poorly known genus. Really reliable identification is possible only from male genitalia.
Kahis |
|
|
|
| cosmln |
Posted on 17-10-2007 00:34
|
|
Member Location: Romania Posts: 956 Joined: 18.03.07 |
Kahis wrote: Hydrellia griseola is by far the most common species - but there are many other, similar species. It is still a rather poorly known genus. Really reliable identification is possible only from male genitalia. i think this is a male... or? if yes i will try to prepare genitalia and make some photo of that. cosmln |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.