Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Crumomyia notabilis
|
|
| ebbek |
Posted on 14-12-2013 23:27
|
|
Member Location: SW Sweden, Halland Posts: 1427 Joined: 23.06.08 |
A Crumomyia, I think, from SW Sweden tosay. About 5 mm and perhaps there are not so many species in this group of this size? Is genera correct and is it possible to say anything about which species it can be?
ebbek attached the following image:  [131.84Kb] Edited by ebbek on 17-12-2013 13:04 |
|
|
|
| ebbek |
Posted on 14-12-2013 23:28
|
|
Member Location: SW Sweden, Halland Posts: 1427 Joined: 23.06.08 |
Other view. More detailed pictures will come in a while.
ebbek attached the following image:  [116.44Kb] |
|
|
|
| ebbek |
Posted on 14-12-2013 23:43
|
|
Member Location: SW Sweden, Halland Posts: 1427 Joined: 23.06.08 |
Detail of first tarsomere of hindleg with a hook
ebbek attached the following image:  [127.46Kb] |
|
|
|
| ebbek |
Posted on 15-12-2013 00:22
|
|
Member Location: SW Sweden, Halland Posts: 1427 Joined: 23.06.08 |
Perhaps C. notabilis - or are there any species to confuse it with? |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 16-12-2013 20:23
|
 Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19268 Joined: 11.05.04 |
A number of species, even. The pictures do not suffice, sorry.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
 |
|
| ebbek |
Posted on 16-12-2013 21:57
|
|
Member Location: SW Sweden, Halland Posts: 1427 Joined: 23.06.08 |
Ok, thanks! I understand that it is not an easy group. It was according to Hackman (1965) and espicially the narrowed pointed foreceps with apical denticles that I suggested notabilis (he also mentions the distinct clouded cross-veins as typical). It is not easy to get a good picture on the foreceps, but here is a not so good. But perhaps it doesn´t make it clearer ..... Krister ebbek attached the following image:  [168.45Kb] |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 17-12-2013 12:04
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19268 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Based on the genitalia it might indeed be notabilis, but rohaceki cannot be ruled out completely. If the anepimeron is completely pruinose, it is notabilis.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| ebbek |
Posted on 17-12-2013 12:14
|
|
Member Location: SW Sweden, Halland Posts: 1427 Joined: 23.06.08 |
Many thanks for help! Anepimerin seems to be completely pruinose. I will try and get a picture on it later. Krister |
|
|
|
| ebbek |
Posted on 17-12-2013 13:02
|
|
Member Location: SW Sweden, Halland Posts: 1427 Joined: 23.06.08 |
A picture on anepimeron. It is not heavily pruinose but there is a clear contrast to the unpruinose parts of anepisternum. Krister ebbek attached the following image:  [187.96Kb] Edited by ebbek on 17-12-2013 13:03 |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.
