Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 orange Fly -> Chrysopilus sp.
|
|
| dipdip |
Posted on 23-06-2013 14:55
|
 Member Location: Thunersee Switzerland Posts: 359 Joined: 17.12.05 |
Can you help? Thanks dipdip attached the following image:  [146.36Kb] Edited by dipdip on 23-06-2013 20:29 |
|
|
|
| Sundew |
Posted on 23-06-2013 16:55
|
 Member Location: Berlin and Baden-Württemberg, Germany Posts: 3916 Joined: 28.07.07 |
It's Rhagionidae, and, according to the key http://home.hccne...nidae.html, a closed anal cell and a very long arista lead us to Chrysopilus. It recalls the one I posted earlier (http://www.dipter...to_id=2879), so possibly C. laetus. The only thing I dislike is that the 3rd antennal segment seems to be wider than the 2nd. That would make it C. luteolus. Regards, Sundew Edited by Sundew on 23-06-2013 17:04 |
|
|
|
| dipdip |
Posted on 23-06-2013 20:35
|
|
Member Location: Thunersee Switzerland Posts: 359 Joined: 17.12.05 |
The 3rd antennal segment does seem to be a little wider. But I don't have really good fotos to show it. Thank you very much for helping and explaning. Regards Maja |
|
|
|
| libor |
Posted on 24-06-2013 07:05
|
|
Member Location: western Bohemia Posts: 1276 Joined: 30.05.09 |
You could study the attached paper. It is really difficult. My colleague Karel Spitzer from the Czech Academy of Science thinks that laetus and luteolus are not two valid species, but just two little different forms of one species, which should be called Chrysopilus luteolus (Fallén, 1814). Libor |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
