Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 8

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,506
· Newest Member: connie
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· npisec01:59:30
· John Carr02:19:58
· ESant04:08:12
· Jfdocampo04:56:18
· Volkmar Nix05:06:33
· Nosferatumyia05:18:20
· alon05:35:18
· Juergen Peters05:48:48
· Waldgeist05:56:24
· Jan Maca05:56:44
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Family forums :: Syrphidae
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
melanistic Scaeva - which?
Sundew
#1 Print Post
Posted on 02-11-2011 00:39
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 3524
Joined: 28.07.07

Hi,
Here is a dark Scaeva female from Austria, Tyrol, Niederthai (1.500 m). I'd like it to name it S. pyrastri var. unicolor (see http://www.dipter...ead_id=126), but I am not fully convinced... S. pyrastri has white, oblique markings, but here the rather straight markings might have been basically yellow as in S. selenitica. The margins of the last tergites are yellow, too, and in the middle of the hind tibiae there is a dark ring like in S. selenitica. However, the dark sternite markings are square and broader than high, which fits S. pyrastri. Can we make a decision between the two species in this case?
Many thanks for help, Sundew
Sundew attached the following image:


[161.28Kb]
 
Menno Reemer
#2 Print Post
Posted on 02-11-2011 18:06
Member

Location:
Posts: 342
Joined: 10.06.04

I would agree with S. selenitica, based on the characters you already mention (shape of markings on tergites, yellow posterior margin of tergite 4). I also think the black markings on the sternites are not square enough for S. pyrastri.
 
Sundew
#3 Print Post
Posted on 02-11-2011 23:38
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 3524
Joined: 28.07.07

Many thanks, Menno - it's good to hear that you also tend to S. selenitica. However, the sternite markings are dubious. May be they are not square enough, but nevertheless they are broader than high. In S. selenitica it should be quite the opposite. I add a normal S. selenitica viewed from below for comparison. At least the dark center of the markings is higher than broad here.
Ok, the upper fly is generally untypical. Is there a taxon name like "var. unicolor" for a melanistic appearance?
Regards, Sundew
Sundew attached the following image:


[132.41Kb]
 
Menno Reemer
#4 Print Post
Posted on 03-11-2011 10:52
Member

Location:
Posts: 342
Joined: 10.06.04

As far as I'm aware there are no names available for colour varieties of S. selenitica.
In S. pyrastri, var. unicolor has been found to occur only in females without ovaries (publications by Van Doesburg 1964, 1970 and Knutson 1971). The cause of this is is unclear, but might have something to do with parasitism in the larval or pupal stage.
In certain genera, e.g. Platycheirus, Melanostoma, Pyrophaena, melanism seems to occur mainly in so-called 'intersexes': specimens with characters intermediate between male and female (eyes not touching but appoaching more closely than in females, postabdominal segments without male genitalia, but nevertheless 'thicker' and more asymmetric than in females).
In many other syrphids, 'melanistic'individuals are just the dark end of a whole range from very dark to very pale individuals. In many cases this is correlated with temperature during the pupal stage (publications by Dusek & Laska, Mart Ottenheim, Jonathan Heal). This is why specimens in early spring, cold summers, at higher latitudes or altitudes tend to be darker than specimens from warmer places.
I think the latter mechanism probably applies to your specimen of S. selenitica (from a high altitude...). It's a dark specimen, but the shape of the markings on the tergits is still visible, and the distribution of other dark and pale specimens is more or less as in normal specimens, albeit the dark parts are more extensive. This would also explain why the dark markings on the sternites are wider than you would expect. Similar kinds of variation in tergal and sternal markings can be noticed in e.g. Dasysyrphus and Eupeodes.
 
Sundew
#5 Print Post
Posted on 03-11-2011 13:58
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 3524
Joined: 28.07.07

I highly appreciate your long and detailed explanation - thank you very much indeed!
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Scaeva selenitica? - 16.08.2020 -> Scaeva selenitica Syrphidae 6 23-08-2020 22:15
Scaeva albomaculata? - 16.08.2020 Syrphidae 3 23-08-2020 19:23
Scaeva pyrastri (male)? Syrphidae 3 10-08-2020 20:36
Scaeva sp.? => Scaeva dignota/selenitica Syrphidae 3 30-06-2020 09:50
Green Syrphidae larva with white dorsal line --> Scaeva cf. pyrastri Syrphidae 5 22-06-2020 13:15
Date and time
24 September 2020 03:49
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

28.08.20 12:57
That woul be up to me, as an administrator. Smile

27.08.20 12:30
I want to move a thread to the Syphridae subforum - how can I do this?

24.08.20 13:17
How do I post?

08.08.20 14:31
ah ok ! I didn't knew oops !

07.08.20 08:12
They are already in Poland !

04.08.20 21:02
Today a Chrysomya albiceps found in North of France ! I was quite surprised !

02.08.20 10:10
Ok... lower case naming for images.. understood,Lothar

02.08.20 10:02
I uploadad a jpg, but it is not visible in the thread...Lothar

30.07.20 21:32
Have you checked the FAQ already?

30.07.20 02:23
cannot upload photos, it says wrong name. can someone please explain the exact procedure and the does and donts?

Render time: 1.53 seconds | 147,059,188 unique visits