Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 8

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,364
· Newest Member: Rolf Larsson
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Stella M00:06:48
· Tony Irwin00:07:16
· Chen00:11:44
· binturong00:15:42
· MikeP00:16:15
· New Forest W...00:26:13
· rcox00:39:56
· Juergen Peters00:49:08
· Danny Wolff00:53:11
· Zeegers01:14:30
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Aedes (s.l.) ID -> Dahliana geniculatus
Carnifex
#1 Print Post
Posted on 21-07-2019 18:44
Member

Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 894
Joined: 23.06.15

Hi,
based on the features provided, can the species be IDed? Found in a garden in Vienna
Could it be Ochlerotatus?

static.inaturalist.org/photos/45630761/large.jpeg
static.inaturalist.org/photos/45630782/large.jpeg
static.inaturalist.org/photos/45630768/large.jpeg
static.inaturalist.org/photos/45630776/large.jpeg
Edited by Carnifex on 22-07-2019 16:33
Cheers, Lorin

Font Color
All requests are from the urban area of Vienna, if not otherwise stated.

My Diptera observations (and other living forms) can be found here, and corrections or comments over there would also be appreciated.
 
Tony Irwin
#2 Print Post
Posted on 21-07-2019 21:41
User Avatar

Member

Location: Norwich, England
Posts: 5913
Joined: 19.11.04

This has the tapered abdomen typical of Aedes s.l., but the cerci are rather short compared to those of Ochlerotatus, which suggests Dahliana geniculatus (confirmed by the lack of pale tarsal rings, together with the very distinctive dorsal thoracic pattern.
Tony
----------
Tony Irwin
 
Carnifex
#3 Print Post
Posted on 22-07-2019 08:25
Member

Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 894
Joined: 23.06.15

Thanks a lot, Tony!
Cheers, Lorin

Font Color
All requests are from the urban area of Vienna, if not otherwise stated.

My Diptera observations (and other living forms) can be found here, and corrections or comments over there would also be appreciated.
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Aedes sp? male, E-HU, Aug 2008 Diptera (adults) 4 08-01-2020 21:07
Culicidae ID > Aedes flavescens/cyprius Diptera (adults) 3 11-12-2019 11:20
Culicidae ID (2) > Aedes cantans/annulipes Diptera (adults) 4 24-11-2019 15:12
Culicidae ID (8) > Aedes communis Diptera (adults) 5 24-11-2019 15:11
Culicidae ID > Aedes cf. rossicus Diptera (adults) 4 18-11-2019 14:20
Date and time
23 February 2020 21:26
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

23.12.19 23:36
thx Paul! All is OK! Merry Xmas to All!

04.12.19 10:23
Thx! TumbsUp

04.12.19 09:33
There are some internal issues withy their servers and they are working on it.

02.12.19 08:42
Anyone knows what happened with the Catalog of Fossil Diptera at the bishopmuseum.org webpage? Cannot access it Frown

01.11.19 22:46
Hi! may I ask, why the soldierfly banner (https://www.dipte
ra.info/images/sol
dierfly-banner.png
) is so big (4790x870 Pixels, 1, 4 M Cool? It always lasts minutes to load on a slow connection and costs a

18.09.19 20:06
Jewell699, you should post it in the forum, not submit it for the gallery.

15.09.19 20:41
Jewelm699 - did you upload it to a forum (which one?) or the gallery? I can't find it.

11.09.19 13:15
I’m hoping someone can identify the phoridae maggot or pupae I just uploaded.

28.08.19 14:29
Rafael p is legs and f1 is fore femur

26.08.19 17:13
If you experienced a very sluggish site recently, it may have been because someone tried to upload a maliciuous script by force. It appears to have failed. The visitor was blocked further access.

Render time: 1.12 seconds | 144,169,653 unique visits