Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Lucilia ampullacea?
|
|
Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-05-2019 00:26
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
Hi, given the genitalia I would call this specimen Lucilia ampullacea. Can someone confirm (or not) the identification, please? location: Porto (Portugal) date: 11/05/2019 Rui Andrade attached the following image: [125.86Kb] |
Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-05-2019 00:26
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
.
Rui Andrade attached the following image: [226.25Kb] |
Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-05-2019 00:27
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
.
Rui Andrade attached the following image: [90.13Kb] |
Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-05-2019 00:27
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
.
Rui Andrade attached the following image: [124.18Kb] |
Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-05-2019 00:28
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
.
Rui Andrade attached the following image: [226.32Kb] |
Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-05-2019 00:28
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
.
Rui Andrade attached the following image: [123.31Kb] |
Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-05-2019 00:29
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
.
Rui Andrade attached the following image: [180.54Kb] |
Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-05-2019 00:29
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
.
Rui Andrade attached the following image: [126.09Kb] |
johnes81 |
Posted on 19-05-2019 14:30
|
Member Location: Berlin, Germany Posts: 1978 Joined: 15.10.16 |
seems okay to me but you should separate the cerci/surstyli and the aedeagus to be certain. The aedeagus is slightly visible and seems like it supports your id too but it should be viewed seaparately.
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts. |
|
|
Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-05-2019 18:17
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
Thank you! I thought that the mass of curled black hairs between the surstyli and aedeagus was very characteristic, besides L. ampullacea only found in L. richardsi (but the basicosta is dark, so I ruled out L. richardsi). I can not separate it at the moment, but I attached two more pictures hoping that they can be useful for identification. Rui Andrade attached the following image: [85.73Kb] |
Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-05-2019 18:18
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
.
Rui Andrade attached the following image: [91.17Kb] |
johnes81 |
Posted on 19-05-2019 18:47
|
Member Location: Berlin, Germany Posts: 1978 Joined: 15.10.16 |
the hairs should be characteristic but you are in Portugal, so it is better to double check Calliphoridae. I agree with Lucilia ampullacea but maybe my opinion doesn't matter. Some people want opinions from experts only. I have two female specimens so i can help with a female too if you find one. I love Calliphoridae and Lucilia are very pretty flies to me. I hope that you have a pleasant day. John and Nini. Naturalists not experts. |
|
|
Rui Andrade |
Posted on 19-05-2019 19:43
|
Member Location: Portugal Posts: 3122 Joined: 19.06.07 |
Of course it matters, I appreciate your help, thank you! |
Jump to Forum: |