Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 14

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,992
· Newest Member: Clementomologiste
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Carnifex00:09:18
· Tony Irwin00:27:11
· Mizar00:47:15
· Raimo00:57:14
· ESant00:58:10
· Woodmen01:23:45
· weia01:26:52
· Volker01:36:34
· kuv02:37:48
· Jan Maca03:32:08
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Swiss Gymnosoma - and some general questions about Tachinidae
Cor Zonneveld
#1 Print Post
Posted on 24-08-2007 20:54
User Avatar

Member

Location: Amstelveen, the Netherlands
Posts: 840
Joined: 14.10.06

Two different achinids form Mavaglia, Tessin. Altitude approx 350 m. Grassland with Centaurea and Aster. The fly was looking for possible victims or mates. From a perch, keenly looking for anything on the move, returning to nearly same perch after flying away several times. It looks like Gymnosoma, but is it?
Cor Zonneveld attached the following image:


[124.45Kb]
Edited by Cor Zonneveld on 25-08-2007 10:40
Thanks for your attention
Cor Zonneveld
 
www.corzonneveld.nl
Cor Zonneveld
#2 Print Post
Posted on 24-08-2007 20:54
User Avatar

Member

Location: Amstelveen, the Netherlands
Posts: 840
Joined: 14.10.06

other angle
Cor Zonneveld attached the following image:


[134.74Kb]
Thanks for your attention
Cor Zonneveld
 
www.corzonneveld.nl
jorgemotalmeida
#3 Print Post
Posted on 24-08-2007 20:55
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

what about the size? Smile Do you have dorsal view photos?
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
jorgemotalmeida
#4 Print Post
Posted on 24-08-2007 20:57
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

Yes! It is Gymnosoma sp. Grin
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
Cor Zonneveld
#5 Print Post
Posted on 24-08-2007 20:58
User Avatar

Member

Location: Amstelveen, the Netherlands
Posts: 840
Joined: 14.10.06

On the same spot, one day earlier, a different species - I guess. Thorax completely black.
Cor Zonneveld attached the following image:


[117.31Kb]
Thanks for your attention
Cor Zonneveld
 
www.corzonneveld.nl
Cor Zonneveld
#6 Print Post
Posted on 24-08-2007 20:59
User Avatar

Member

Location: Amstelveen, the Netherlands
Posts: 840
Joined: 14.10.06

Size: not a big fly, say 6 - 7 mm. Date: mid July. I'll loke for decent dorsal shot...
Thanks for your attention
Cor Zonneveld
 
www.corzonneveld.nl
Cor Zonneveld
#7 Print Post
Posted on 24-08-2007 21:03
User Avatar

Member

Location: Amstelveen, the Netherlands
Posts: 840
Joined: 14.10.06

dorsal view
Cor Zonneveld attached the following image:


[106.89Kb]
Thanks for your attention
Cor Zonneveld
 
www.corzonneveld.nl
Cor Zonneveld
#8 Print Post
Posted on 24-08-2007 21:07
User Avatar

Member

Location: Amstelveen, the Netherlands
Posts: 840
Joined: 14.10.06

I'm inclined to make a kind of Freudian view of this one...
Cor Zonneveld attached the following image:


[109.61Kb]
Thanks for your attention
Cor Zonneveld
 
www.corzonneveld.nl
Zeegers
#9 Print Post
Posted on 25-08-2007 08:55
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 18822
Joined: 21.07.04

The first one is a male G. dolycoridis.
The second one not only other species, but also other sex (all female Gymnosoma have black thorax): female G. nudifrons.

You may find up to 4 species of Gymnosoma on 1 locality !!

Theo
 
Cor Zonneveld
#10 Print Post
Posted on 25-08-2007 10:36
User Avatar

Member

Location: Amstelveen, the Netherlands
Posts: 840
Joined: 14.10.06

Thanks Theo. I looked in the gallery, but find it difficult to see differences between the various Gymnosoma's. What is the basis for the ID in this case? Locality alone? Probably not, since you mention there can be up to 4 Gymno's in a single locality!

I also have some more general questions about Tachinidae. Most of them are VERY bristly. I tend to recognize Tachinids on bristles alone... Is there any idea why they are so bristly?
Related question: Gymnosoma isn't bristly at all - I guess that's where it got its name from (Gymno = naked, soma = body). So why are some Tachinids not bristly at all??

My personal guess: bristles were present in protoTachinid. They have no function, but do no harm either. In one or more branches of Tachinidae bristles got lost. Once lost, they were lost permanently, since they are functionless.

Contra this: bristels cost nutrient and energy, so loosing them offers opportunity for more eggs, very relevant with their life style.

Who has any ideas about this?
Edited by Cor Zonneveld on 25-08-2007 10:39
Thanks for your attention
Cor Zonneveld
 
www.corzonneveld.nl
jorgemotalmeida
#11 Print Post
Posted on 25-08-2007 10:55
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

Usually most tachinids have no petiole (almost Rhinophoridae have this - i think there are very few exceptions.) and they have a very sharp bent in M vein. They have subscutellum (there are indeed some calliphorids with subscutellum to complicate much more !) but this feature is rather hard to see in photos. Sad

And I don?t think that loosing bristles can gives more eggs (human beings loose their hairs and this not affected the descentSmile ... The bristles could have sensory function, but really I don?t know.
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
Zeegers
#12 Print Post
Posted on 25-08-2007 13:09
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 18822
Joined: 21.07.04

Right.

I suppose the bristles have a sensory function.
This makes sense when you are operation in thick vegetation, like canopies for instance. In grasslands, it might be less functional. That's where most of the Phasiinae are found.
But I agree instantly, many counterexamples to this simple line of reasoning can be given.


Theo
 
Cor Zonneveld
#13 Print Post
Posted on 25-08-2007 20:54
User Avatar

Member

Location: Amstelveen, the Netherlands
Posts: 840
Joined: 14.10.06

Usually most tachinids have no petiole ... etc.


That's how to recognize a Tachinid by a key. But on first sight I recognize a Tachinid without noticing any of these features. It's the bristles that count.

BTW, my question of recognition concerned the different Gymnosoma's...Shock

And I don?t think that loosing bristles can gives more eggs (human beings loose their hairs and this not affected the descent


What I meant was loosing them in an evolutionary sense (I was ambiguous here - my mistake) Like Gymnosoma must have done. Not developing bristles means you can invest in different functions - like reproduction.

I suppose the bristles have a sensory function.


For reasons of sensory function I suppose the antennae of Tachinids are often oversized (see e.g. Gymnosoma). What use would a bristle be to a Tachinid which is not also useful to a host of different flies that lack the bristles?

I guess we just don't know enough about the reasons they have bristles
Edited by Cor Zonneveld on 25-08-2007 21:09
Thanks for your attention
Cor Zonneveld
 
www.corzonneveld.nl
jorgemotalmeida
#14 Print Post
Posted on 25-08-2007 21:26
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

That's how to recognize a Tachinid by a key. But on first sight I recognize a Tachinid without noticing any of these features. It's the bristles that count.
BTW, my question of recognition concerned the different Gymnosoma's...Shock


Smile There are muscids with bristles as well, if I'm not wrong.
Concerning Gymnosoma, I still don?t know how we can split them. I know that through photos is not an easy task! Pfft



Not loosing them, just not developing them! Like Gymnosoma. Loosing them offers no gain. Not developing them means you can invest in different functions - like reproduction.


As far as I know Gymnosoma doesn?t seem to have any special gain for the lack of bristles.


For reasons of sensory function I suppose the antennae of Tachinids are often oversized (see e.g. Gymnosoma). What use would a bristle be to a Tachinid which is not also useful to a host of different flies that lack the bristles? I guess we just don't know enough about the reasons they have bristles


Perhaps the bristles are very sensitive, and they lack of interest for some habitats... independently of oversized (or not) antennas. For example, to avoid obstacles in a very tick vegetation, it would be helpful to have many and hard bristles.. These are suppositions. Perhaps Theo could tell more. Smile

Really, very interesting questions, keep asking them! Smile I wish to know the answers. Wink But even we know those answers, other questions arise again... and again... Smile
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
Zeegers
#15 Print Post
Posted on 26-08-2007 08:24
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 18822
Joined: 21.07.04

Antennae are primarily for smelling. So they have little or no tactile function.
As for Gymnosoma, the genus badly needs a revision, but noone dares to take on this task. The differences are to be found in the pattern of dusting on thorax and scutellum, as in the male and female genitalia.
Tschorsnig & Herting (Tachinidae Mitteleuropas oder so etwas) give a very decent key.

Theo
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Tachinidae ? Diptera (adults) 3 20-12-2024 19:47
Tachinidae? => Phorocera assimils Diptera (adults) 3 17-12-2024 05:05
Tachinidae: Cap Saint-Jacques, Québec, Canada Diptera (adults) 7 16-12-2024 01:26
Tachinidae: Orford, Québec, Canada Diptera (adults) 2 14-12-2024 23:35
Tachinidae: Gymnosoma nitens Diptera (adults) 5 11-12-2024 21:42
Date and time
23 December 2024 21:27
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

19.12.24 12:33
Received missing pages from @royensoc.co.uk, free download available for a few days: https://we.tl/t-vk
a2lFLsYU

17.12.24 23:03
Downloaded the British Handbook Diptera: Bibionid and Scatopsidae flies but pages 58, 59, 67, 68 are missing. Anybody has a complete copy?

08.11.24 16:10
Www.abebooks.com

29.07.24 13:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 11:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 12:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 15:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 13:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 13:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 11:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

Render time: 1.90 seconds | 206,595,516 unique visits