Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Anthomyiidae: Pegomya sp.
|
|
| Tony T |
Posted on 21-08-2007 01:07
|
 Member Location: New Brunswick, Canada Posts: 663 Joined: 08.02.07 |
20 August 2007, New Brunswick, Canada. Suburban garden. Legth: 7 mm. I'm thinkimg Sciomyzidae Tony T attached the following image:  [81.44Kb] Edited by Tony T on 20-08-2008 00:46 |
|
|
|
| jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 21-08-2007 01:12
|
 Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9295 Joined: 05.06.06 |
this is not sciomyzid... |
 |
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 21-08-2007 07:27
|
 Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19375 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Muscidae...
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Tony T |
Posted on 21-08-2007 14:29
|
|
Member Location: New Brunswick, Canada Posts: 663 Joined: 08.02.07 |
Thanks Jorge & Paul. I must show more respect for muscids, I thought they were all non-descript grey flies. |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 21-08-2007 14:37
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19375 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Have a look in the Gallery and you will see some nice examples not fitting your previous concept of Muscidae. 
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Kahis |
Posted on 21-08-2007 16:00
|
 Member Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 1999 Joined: 02.09.04 |
O suspect this one is in fact an anthomyiid...
Kahis |
|
|
|
| Nikita Vikhrev |
Posted on 21-08-2007 16:43
|
 Member Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 9349 Joined: 24.05.05 |
Tony, could we see more hind legs?
Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University |
|
|
|
| Tony T |
Posted on 22-08-2007 13:34
|
|
Member Location: New Brunswick, Canada Posts: 663 Joined: 08.02.07 |
Looked at Muscid page - some attractive flies; I'm always learning. Surely not another "damned anthomyiid" in another "damned genus"  To photograph a hind leg I would have to remove one, relax it, and flatten it. Could you tell me what you are looking for  |
|
|
|
| Nikita Vikhrev |
Posted on 22-08-2007 18:20
|
|
Member Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 9349 Joined: 24.05.05 |
The choise is between Pegomya, Thricops, Phaonia... Well: 1. Is vien R4+5 setulose basally? 2. How many pd on t3? 3. Is there small v seta on very base of hind basytarsus? 4. How long vein A? 5. Is scutellum fine hairy ventrally? Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University |
|
|
|
| Tony T |
Posted on 22-08-2007 20:23
|
|
Member Location: New Brunswick, Canada Posts: 663 Joined: 08.02.07 |
Thanks, I wish I hadn't asked Will check out all 5, once I work out what a pd on t3 is. Tabanids are so easy  |
|
|
|
| Nikita Vikhrev |
Posted on 22-08-2007 20:26
|
|
Member Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 9349 Joined: 24.05.05 |
Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 22-08-2007 20:39
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19375 Joined: 11.05.04 |
pd = posterodorsal, meaning posterodorsal setae.
Edited by Paul Beuk on 22-08-2007 20:42 Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Tony T |
Posted on 24-08-2007 01:50
|
|
Member Location: New Brunswick, Canada Posts: 663 Joined: 08.02.07 |
Nikita Vikhrev wrote: The choise is between Pegomya, Thricops, Phaonia... Well: 1. Is vien R4+5 setulose basally? 2. How many pd on t3? 3. Is there small v seta on very base of hind basytarsus? 4. How long vein A? 5. Is scutellum fine hairy ventrally? 1 No 2 4 or 5, see diagram 3 No 4 Reaches wing margin 5 No Tony T attached the following image:  [17.91Kb] |
|
|
|
| Nikita Vikhrev |
Posted on 24-08-2007 07:39
|
|
Member Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 9349 Joined: 24.05.05 |
Nice Job, Tony 5. If 2 strong setae on middle of your diagram is pd - than correct answer is 2pd + 2ad (last (3-d) pd - (pre)apical). Anyway your diagram is very usefull - it shows "Angthomyiidae type" on t3 Along with other points it seems to my that Kahis was right - Anthomyiidae, probably Pegomya. Kahis? Nikita Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University |
|
|
|
| Kahis |
Posted on 24-08-2007 09:13
|
|
Member Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 1999 Joined: 02.09.04 |
Yes, I agree, Kahis was right as usual
Edited by Kahis on 24-08-2007 09:13 Kahis |
|
|
|
| Tony T |
Posted on 24-08-2007 18:11
|
|
Member Location: New Brunswick, Canada Posts: 663 Joined: 08.02.07 |
Nikita Vikhrev wrote: Nice Job, Tony 5. If 2 strong setae on middle of your diagram is pd - than correct answer is 2pd + 2ad (last (3-d) pd - (pre)apical). Anyway your diagram is very usefull - it shows "Angthomyiidae type" on t3 Along with other points it seems to my that Kahis was right - Anthomyiidae, probably Pegomya. Kahis? Nikita OK, 2pd and 2ad, didn't realize there was a 3-d pd: Saw Paul's ref. to pd, thought I understood it and then forgot all about the ad's With all my fancy photo equipment thought that I should be able to get a decent photo; seems OK but not entirely satisfied. Thank you all for your comments. Tony T attached the following image:  [66.17Kb] |
|
|
|
| Nikita Vikhrev |
Posted on 24-08-2007 18:38
|
|
Member Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 9349 Joined: 24.05.05 |
3. Is there small v seta on very base of hind basytarsus? and we can see this seta on your photo
Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 24-08-2007 20:14
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19375 Joined: 11.05.04 |
The correct spelling would be basitarsus, often also named metatarsus but officially named as first tarsomere.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
