Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
=> Chrysopilus laetus
|
|
npisec |
Posted on 07-06-2017 08:32
|
Member Location: Slovenia Posts: 581 Joined: 01.09.15 |
Slovenija, kočevska, Predgrad, 340m Can somebody identify it? Is it one of Chrysopilus sp.? Regards, Natalija npisec attached the following image: ![]() [270.78Kb] Edited by npisec on 27-06-2017 22:15 |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 07-06-2017 09:04
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18858 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Yes. Ch. lutea or similar. Theo |
|
|
npisec |
Posted on 08-06-2017 21:48
|
Member Location: Slovenia Posts: 581 Joined: 01.09.15 |
Thank you Theo ![]() Greetings from Slovenia, Natalija |
|
|
npisec |
Posted on 21-06-2017 20:53
|
Member Location: Slovenia Posts: 581 Joined: 01.09.15 |
Is it Ch. lutea or Ch. luteolus or Ch. laetus?
Edited by npisec on 21-06-2017 22:10 |
|
|
Paul Beuk |
Posted on 22-06-2017 08:15
|
![]() Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19403 Joined: 11.05.04 |
... luteolus but why isn't it laetus?
Edited by Paul Beuk on 22-06-2017 08:21 Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
Zeegers |
Posted on 22-06-2017 08:39
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18858 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Yes, that was the 'or similar' part. alooks like laetus, indeed. Theo |
|
|
npisec |
Posted on 22-06-2017 09:15
|
Member Location: Slovenia Posts: 581 Joined: 01.09.15 |
Thank you Paul and Theo ![]() Greetings from Slovenia, Natalija |
|
|
libor |
Posted on 23-06-2017 08:36
|
Member Location: western Bohemia Posts: 1276 Joined: 30.05.09 |
Some authors do not accept both species and placed luteolus as a synonym to laetus. Krivosheina (2008) published paper on this species group and according to her sentences and your picture and believe it is C. laetus. Libor |
|
|
npisec |
Posted on 23-06-2017 20:23
|
Member Location: Slovenia Posts: 581 Joined: 01.09.15 |
Thank you Libor ![]() Greetings from Slovenia, Natalija |
|
Jump to Forum: |