Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Therevidae Thereva inornata?
|
|
| blowave |
Posted on 23-08-2012 13:20
|
 Member Location: LINCOLN, UK Posts: 3151 Joined: 27.06.07 |
Hi. This looks different to the normal one I have, Thereva nobilitata. It seems to key to Thereva inornata, I have two other photos from the same day but at a different time which looks to be the same. 14th July in my garden, south of Lincoln UK. Janet blowave attached the following image:  [189.61Kb] http://cubits.org... |
 |
|
| andrewsi |
Posted on 23-08-2012 15:04
|
|
Member Location: Pocklington UK Posts: 216 Joined: 15.08.09 |
You must have had some strong northerly winds, as inornata is a rarity of the Scottish Highlands.  It's also a more grey species, if you have a look in the gallery. nobilitata is most likely. Ian |
|
|
|
| blowave |
Posted on 23-08-2012 16:05
|
|
Member Location: LINCOLN, UK Posts: 3151 Joined: 27.06.07 |
andrewsi wrote: You must have had some strong northerly winds, as inornata is a rarity of the Scottish Highlands. It's also a more grey species, if you have a look in the gallery. nobilitata is most likely. Ian There's photos of T. inornata in the gallery looks very much like mine, so how reliable is the colour? http://www.dipter...oto_id=950 http://www.dipter...oto_id=951 There is a record not very far north of me, and one further south. http://data.nbn.o...0000007930 As I have had other very rare diptera which shouldn't be here, I view anything as possible! Ferdinandea ruficornis is one I had last year and it's supposed to be only around the New Forest for the last few decades. I have also had Cheilosia uviformis 99% certain identified by Martin Speight, and Greenomyia mongolica, I think my record is only about the 8th, along with a few other rarities. Never say never. However, I guess T. nobilitata is more likely.
http://cubits.org... |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 29-08-2012 19:13
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18546 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Hold your horses. It is a male. You'd really need to check the genitalia. The rest is pure speculation. Theo |
|
|
|
| blowave |
Posted on 17-09-2012 23:55
|
|
Member Location: LINCOLN, UK Posts: 3151 Joined: 27.06.07 |
Zeegers wrote: Hold your horses. It is a male. You'd really need to check the genitalia. The rest is pure speculation. Theo Thanks Theo, you are correct, they can all look the same! 
http://cubits.org... |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
