Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
 Rhagionidae - Rhagio vitripennis
|
|
| Frank Koehler |
Posted on 04-10-2006 05:50
|
 Member Location: Bornheim / Rheinl. (D) Posts: 280 Joined: 30.09.06 |
Good morning. These are my photos of (common) Rhagionidae? frome the Rhineland. I would be glad to add some names to the photo folders and upload to the gallery here. Unfurtunally the upload doesn?t work with my browser. Best regards Frank #6687 Germany / Rheinland-Pfalz: Gerolstein, Forest Eischeid, 600 m, VII.2004   #6714 Germany / NRW: Bornheim-Waldorf, V.2006  #6885 Germany / NRW: Swisttal-Heimertzheim, V.2006 
Edited by Frank Koehler on 19-10-2006 18:32 |
 |
|
| crex |
Posted on 04-10-2006 06:55
|
 Member Location: Sweden Posts: 1996 Joined: 22.05.06 |
Have you read the FAQ about submitting photos for the gallery? I also think someone mentioned that the file extension must be lower case. |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 04-10-2006 07:00
|
 Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19403 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Not to mention the fact that if you tried to upload 6687-6690-dip-rhagionidae-rhagio-scolopaceus-eischeid-030704.jpg under that very same name, then probably upload failed because that name is too long. 
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 04-10-2006 07:46
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 19208 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Back to the content: Looks like Rhagio vitripennis Theo |
|
|
|
| Frank Koehler |
Posted on 04-10-2006 14:29
|
|
Member Location: Bornheim / Rheinl. (D) Posts: 280 Joined: 30.09.06 |
Thank you for your answers: @crex & Paul: There is a misunderstanding, i said "upload to the gallery". I studied the faq, the extension is jpg, the files names are not to long for any internet server (I didn?t want to burn a CD-Rom), there are no forbidden characters for unix servers, the file size was optimized by filtering and saving with NeatImage (about 50k). I have a lot of well identified fly photos (Tachinidae, Tabanbidae, Syrphidae, Tipulidae, Asilidae ...) and wanted to start uploading some good images to the gallery (not forum). The upload form works properly, but I can?t see the photos in the gallery  I thoughth, it would be a good idea to send a contribution, not only questions [Edit:  There was a time lag of a few days. The photos are online now. Rewieved by the administrator? You should mentioon this in your faq ]@Zeegers: Three locations, same species? The third specimen is (population was) larger the second: 6714 = 8,4 mm, 6885 = 13,8 mm. Best regards Frank Edited by Frank Koehler on 04-10-2006 14:34 --------------------------------------------------- Col.: http://www.koleop...de/gallery Het.: http://www.hetero... --------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
| crex |
Posted on 04-10-2006 14:37
|
|
Member Location: Sweden Posts: 1996 Joined: 22.05.06 |
Frank Koehler wrote: ... The upload form works properly, but I can?t see the photos in the gallery ... Gallery submissions are moderated by Paul Beuk! You will not see the photos until Paul has approved them. |
|
|
|
| Frank Koehler |
Posted on 04-10-2006 15:08
|
|
Member Location: Bornheim / Rheinl. (D) Posts: 280 Joined: 30.09.06 |
@crex:  we have been typing simultaneous.That is ok , but should be mentioned in the faq. I do the same im my galleries - to avoid swarms of ladybirds. Greetings Frank --------------------------------------------------- Col.: http://www.koleop...de/gallery Het.: http://www.hetero... --------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 04-10-2006 15:20
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 19208 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Back to the content again (I repeat myself) My ID is based on the second image. In the other images, it is difficult to see the wing, which is needed or at least very helpful. I guess Rh. vitripennis is common around your place. On the other hand, Rh. scolopaceus is probably at least as common. I cannot rule out Rh. scolopaceus from lateral view. Maybe a real expert can. Theo |
|
|
|
| Frank Koehler |
Posted on 04-10-2006 17:10
|
|
Member Location: Bornheim / Rheinl. (D) Posts: 280 Joined: 30.09.06 |
Thanks Theo, unfortunately I can offer only wing details of the large species (6885): |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 04-10-2006 18:20
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 19208 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Thanks Frank This helps The last one would be Rh. vitripennis as well, as is the fourth one. So most of the material would be Rh. vitripennis in my opinion. The other might be Rh. vitripennis as well, might on the other hand be Rh. scolopaceus. My guess is that it's all vitripennis, but gut-feelings are not so scientific, are they ! Theo |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |