Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 6

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,824
· Newest Member: oscarhopgood
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Nosferatumyia02:31:58
· Gansucha04:24:38
· andrewsi05:48:01
· Arthur van O...06:03:14
· Carnifex06:20:46
· ESant06:23:03
· Karola06:46:05
· piros06:56:53
· weia07:13:32
· ebbek07:28:04
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Miscellaneous :: General queries
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Heteromyza females
KWQ
#1 Print Post
Posted on 15-01-2011 08:25
Member

Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 208
Joined: 10.12.04

Does anyone happen to have Lindner's volume V (part 2?) at hand - or in any case that one with Heleomyzidae.
Just that part was missing from the Helsinki museum and I think Andrzej once mentioned that it is relevant here.

My question is: Can Heteromyza atricornis-female be differentiated from H. commixta?

If the descriptions are lengthy, I'd be grateful for the page numbers too, so that I could perhaps order them to the local library.
 
phil withers
#2 Print Post
Posted on 15-01-2011 17:14
Member

Location: Lyon, France
Posts: 521
Joined: 04.03.08

If you are referring to Die Fliegen, then Czerny separates commixta from atricornis/rotundicornis on the width of the cheek relative to the frons: in commixta , cheeks as wide as frons, in the othe two narrower. Not terribly helpful and doubtfully useful I would say.
 
Andrzej
#3 Print Post
Posted on 15-01-2011 20:27
Member

Location: Poland
Posts: 2250
Joined: 05.01.06

At time there is the only way to separate the females of mentioned species Frown
dr. A. J. Woznica, Institute of Environmental Biology, Wroclaw University of Environmental & Life Sciences
 
KWQ
#4 Print Post
Posted on 16-01-2011 08:34
Member

Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 208
Joined: 10.12.04

Many thanks to both of you, Phil and Andrzej!

Sorry about the confusion with the name of the series: 90% of my use of it is the Lindner's part of Anthomyiidae (or Muscidae), so I always tend to forget that the official name is "Die Fliegen".

But having a lack of comparison material I guess that this female will remain a Heteromyza sp. and we should collect a male next time!
 
KWQ
#5 Print Post
Posted on 18-01-2011 15:06
Member

Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 208
Joined: 10.12.04

I cast one final glance to this female specimen (collected in south-western Finland 10.4. 2010) and noticed that it really had remarkably narrow cheeks, about one fourth of the width of frons in the middle. So that would rule commixta out.

But does Die Fliegen say anything about the differences between rotundicornis and atricornis females? Could their flight period be different - at least the only Finnish specimen of rotundicornis so far was collected in the beginning of August.

Anyway, I'm pretty convinced that this is a Heteromyza atricornis (Meigen)-female, but how to obtain the final proof, that's the question!
 
phil withers
#6 Print Post
Posted on 18-01-2011 18:19
Member

Location: Lyon, France
Posts: 521
Joined: 04.03.08

Czerny says "Vibrissae well below lower level of eyes, eyes at level of antennal base not narrowed = atricornis. Vibrissae at lower level of eyes, eyes at level of antennal base narrowed = rotundicornis". Collin (pompous old *** that he was) doubted that the two could be separated in females, but was sure Czerny knew his stuff...hmm.
 
KWQ
#7 Print Post
Posted on 18-01-2011 19:02
Member

Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 208
Joined: 10.12.04

Thanks once again, Phil!

My atricornis-theory got a severe backlash since I would say that the vibrissa is at the same level or rather slightly above the lower level of eye.

And I can't really say anything about the other character mentioned. Quoting you, hmmmm...
 
KWQ
#8 Print Post
Posted on 09-06-2011 09:35
Member

Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 208
Joined: 10.12.04

Returning to this business after a while: Yesterday in Turku I caught my first male from this pair H. atricornis/rotundicornis. Only the latter has been previously recorded from Finland and it too is here rare.

The vibrissae of this specimen are well above the lower line of the eye and frons somewhat tapering towards antennae - does this mean that atricornis is ruled out?

So, any further wisdom in separating these two species is greatly appreciated...
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Heleomyzidae: Heteromyza sp. ♀ Diptera (adults) 5 02-10-2022 19:40
Heleomyzidae: Heteromyza? Diptera (adults) 3 11-05-2022 15:55
Heleomyzidae: Heteromyza Diptera (adults) 5 21-03-2022 13:32
Heleomyzidae, ID please => Heteromyza sp. Diptera (adults) 7 10-03-2022 09:03
Heteromyza Diptera (adults) 7 04-03-2022 19:57
Date and time
06 February 2023 05:01
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

27.12.22 21:10
Thanks, Jan Willem! Much appreciated. Grin

19.12.22 11:33
Thanks Paul for your work on keeping this forum available! Just made a donation via PayPal.

09.10.22 17:07
Yes, dipterologists from far abroad, please buy your copy at veldshop. Stamps will be expensive, but he, the book is unreasonably cheap Smile

07.10.22 11:55
Can any1 help out with a pdf copy of 1941 Hammer. Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk Naturhist. Foren. 105; thank you

05.10.22 19:59
Found! https://www.veldsh
op.nl

05.10.22 19:53
@zeegers, your book seems difficult to get from Spain, is there another way?

08.09.22 09:29
Ladies and gentlemen https://jeugdbonds
uitgeverij.nl/prod
uct/families-of-fl
ies-with-three-pul
villi/

26.08.22 15:06
Lis - This is vol.11 (eleven) and is 346 pages. Sorry, don't have a copy.

15.08.22 14:22
Hello, can any1 help out with a copy of Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera II: Scathophagidae-Hyp
odennatidae? or at least how many pages it is? thx

19.06.22 07:42
I can not post an image - I do all right - dont know what to do! Gunther

Render time: 1.22 seconds | 173,695,267 unique visits