Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Rhamphomyia cinerascens?
|
|
| blowave |
Posted on 15-01-2010 18:55
|
 Member Location: LINCOLN, UK Posts: 3151 Joined: 27.06.07 |
Hi, The one which is called R. subcinerascens here, but is the same.  Is this correct? Taken on 9th May 2009, my garden near Lincoln UK. I have it marked as 6mm long. 2 pics Janet 
blowave attached the following image:  [108.95Kb] |
 |
|
| blowave |
Posted on 15-01-2010 18:55
|
|
Member Location: LINCOLN, UK Posts: 3151 Joined: 27.06.07 |
pic 2
blowave attached the following image:  [111.42Kb] |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 15-01-2010 19:36
|
 Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19250 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Certainly not (sub)cinerascens as the anal lobe is not darkened. Too few details visible for anything other than Rhamphomyia s.str.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| blowave |
Posted on 15-01-2010 20:09
|
|
Member Location: LINCOLN, UK Posts: 3151 Joined: 27.06.07 |
We have 14 Rhamphomyia listed for the UK. R. albosegmentata, ignobilis, laevipes, morio, nitidula, plumipes, spinipes, stigmosa, cinerascens, sulcata, sulcatella, sulcatina, tibialis, vesiculosa. Do any of the others have this coloured wings? I don't know what the 's.str' stands for in Rhamphomyia s.str |
|
|
|
| Stephen R |
Posted on 15-01-2010 20:35
|
 Member Location: Clitheroe Lancashire UK Posts: 2396 Joined: 12.06.09 |
s.str. = sensu stricto, in the strict (narrow) sense. s.l. = sensu lato, in the broad sense. Used when a taxon (in this case the genus Rhamphomyia) has been split up into smaller units, one of which retains the name that used to cover the whole group. Stephen. Edited by Stephen R on 15-01-2010 20:41 |
|
|
|
| blowave |
Posted on 15-01-2010 21:54
|
|
Member Location: LINCOLN, UK Posts: 3151 Joined: 27.06.07 |
Thanks for the explanation Stephen, I should have realised it was sensu stricto but still probably needed a good explanation on how it related to diptera. Could this be Rhamphomyia sulcata? I guess the answer to that is yes, but it could also be something else or Paul would have said so.  |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 16-01-2010 00:09
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19250 Joined: 11.05.04 |
You are correct in your assumption that it also could be another one.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
