Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
A new family for the Gallery
|
|
Dmitry Gavryushin |
Posted on 21-05-2008 18:54
|
![]() Member Location: Moscow region, Russia Posts: 3308 Joined: 17.10.05 |
I came quickly enough to Hyperoscelididae (which I understand is Canthyloscelidae now) in Stackelberg's family key. Now I'm pretty sure it's a Hyperoscelis eximia. May 20, 2008, Naro-Fominsk, Moscow region, Russia. Size 5 mm.
Dmitry Gavryushin attached the following image: ![]() [97.06Kb] |
|
|
Paul Beuk |
Posted on 22-05-2008 07:11
|
![]() Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19403 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Nice to see a photo of one for once.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
Colobo |
Posted on 03-06-2008 05:51
|
Member Location: Switzerland Posts: 82 Joined: 03.05.07 |
Yes, it is almost certainly Hyperoscelis eximia. However the best character for separating this species from the vicinous H. veternosa (shape of dark pigmented part of base of vein M after Rohacek & Bartak 2007) is not clearly visible in this picture. Anyway, both species are flies of rare occurence ! |
|
|
Dmitry Gavryushin |
Posted on 03-06-2008 10:18
|
![]() Member Location: Moscow region, Russia Posts: 3308 Joined: 17.10.05 |
Many thanks Colobo. In Nagatomi and Saigusa (1984) two external distinguishing characters are mentioned (after Mamaev and Krivosheina (1969) and Hutson (1977)), that is: 1) vein between cells SM and P1 is shorter than (in veternosa) or as long as (in eximia) than that between cells M and P1, I understand that means corresponding lengths of R4+5; 2) thickened part of the vein between cells B and P3 is parallel (in veternosa) or not parallel (in eximia) with vein R1. I've checked the specimen and according to 1 it's rather veternosa but according to 2 it's eximia. These two are not very reliable characters, though.
Edited by Dmitry Gavryushin on 03-06-2008 10:18 |
|
Jump to Forum: |