Diptera.info :: Family forums :: Syrphidae
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Tachinidae, Chetogena?
|
|
varganimrod |
Posted on 07-01-2023 23:15
|
Member Location: Posts: 803 Joined: 11.10.22 |
2
varganimrod attached the following image: [85.04Kb] |
|
|
varganimrod |
Posted on 07-01-2023 23:15
|
Member Location: Posts: 803 Joined: 11.10.22 |
3.
varganimrod attached the following image: [95.86Kb] |
|
|
varganimrod |
Posted on 07-01-2023 23:15
|
Member Location: Posts: 803 Joined: 11.10.22 |
4.
varganimrod attached the following image: [84.87Kb] |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 08-01-2023 10:16
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18785 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Yes, the eye is bare, so it is an Exorista. Theo |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 08-01-2023 10:17
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18785 Joined: 21.07.04 |
And somehow this ended up in the Syrphid forum ….. |
|
|
varganimrod |
Posted on 08-01-2023 14:18
|
Member Location: Posts: 803 Joined: 11.10.22 |
Thanks! The only thing why I didn’t think that this is an Exorista, is the petiole of the r5 cell, in picture 2. I don’t know how it ended up in the Syrphidae forum. Edited by varganimrod on 08-01-2023 14:19 |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 08-01-2023 15:17
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18785 Joined: 21.07.04 |
I think the pic is misleading, there is probably no petiole. Anyway, Chaetogena has bristles on more than half of the facial ridge, this one has not. The bristles you see are descending frontals. Theo |
|
|
varganimrod |
Posted on 09-01-2023 23:37
|
Member Location: Posts: 803 Joined: 11.10.22 |
Thank you very much! I understand it now. |
|
Jump to Forum: |