Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Tachinidae, ID please => Tachina magnicornis/nupta.
|
|
| binturong |
Posted on 29-04-2021 12:26
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 2998 Joined: 05.11.16 |
Western part of Slovenia, 29.4.2021, 450 m asl binturong attached the following image:  [119.91Kb] Edited by binturong on 29-04-2021 18:40 |
|
|
|
| binturong |
Posted on 29-04-2021 12:26
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 2998 Joined: 05.11.16 |
binturong attached the following image:  [142.84Kb] |
|
|
|
| binturong |
Posted on 29-04-2021 12:27
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 2998 Joined: 05.11.16 |
binturong attached the following image:  [106.7Kb] |
|
|
|
| binturong |
Posted on 29-04-2021 12:27
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 2998 Joined: 05.11.16 |
binturong attached the following image:  [157.56Kb] |
|
|
|
| eklans |
Posted on 29-04-2021 14:57
|
|
Member Location: Franconia, Germany Posts: 3708 Joined: 11.11.18 |
Hi binturong, I think it's a female Tachina magnicornis/nupta. The 4th segment of the foretarsus is not wider than long (2nd image): nupta (T&H key). Greetings, Eric |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 29-04-2021 17:07
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18825 Joined: 21.07.04 |
It is a female, therefore I would not dare to make very definitive IDs. The matter is way too complicated to base an ID on just one feature. For what it is worth, antennal shape suggests magnicornis rather than nupta to me. Theo |
|
|
|
| eklans |
Posted on 29-04-2021 18:07
|
|
Member Location: Franconia, Germany Posts: 3708 Joined: 11.11.18 |
Hi Theo, thanks for curbing me - I totally agree! I do not know the difference in the antennal shape and I was happy to see the 4th tarsus so clearly. So we should remain with T. magnicornis/nupta. Greetings, Eric Edited by eklans on 29-04-2021 18:08 |
|
|
|
| binturong |
Posted on 29-04-2021 18:43
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 2998 Joined: 05.11.16 |
Thank you very much both of you |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
