Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Other insects, spiders, etc.
Who is here? 2 guest(s)
Page 1 of 2: 12
|
Thrips sp. ?? and others
|
|
jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 25-08-2006 19:03
|
Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9295 Joined: 05.06.06 |
Hi I took this image today, 25th August 2006, in Silgueiros - Viseu - PORTUGAL. I put a pitfall that caught some very interesting insects and spiders. Spiders belongs to the Gnaphosidae family. (all 4) 1 - Thrips sp. ??? 2 - Wasp --- which family? it is wingless 3 - acari ?? 4 - Collembolans jorgemotalmeida attached the following image: [193.77Kb] |
proctoss |
Posted on 25-08-2006 19:38
|
Member Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 191 Joined: 13.08.06 |
"1 - Thrips sp. ??? 2 - Wasp --- which family? it is wingless" 1 - Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) 2 - Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) |
Paul Beuk |
Posted on 25-08-2006 20:13
|
Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19363 Joined: 11.05.04 |
And I agree with 3 and 4.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
cthirion |
Posted on 26-08-2006 00:03
|
Member Location: Awirs (Flémalle) Belgique Posts: 901 Joined: 13.08.04 |
Number one..................Staphylinidae ! Half Elytron!!!!!!! Calamity Camille cthirion |
cthirion |
Posted on 26-08-2006 11:23
|
Member Location: Awirs (Flémalle) Belgique Posts: 901 Joined: 13.08.04 |
4" not 1"= thrips! 3= mite in english (acarien) cthirion |
jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 26-08-2006 11:56
|
Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9295 Joined: 05.06.06 |
cthirion wrote: 4" not 1"= thrips! 3= mite in english (acarien) Yes, it is mite. Sure. But the 4 I think I have almost 99% sure that is collembolan. It is very different from Thrips sp. Edited by jorgemotalmeida on 26-08-2006 16:36 |
Jan Willem |
Posted on 26-08-2006 14:55
|
Member Location: Waalwijk, The Netherlands Posts: 2136 Joined: 24.07.04 |
I think Jorge is right about 4 not being Thrips but Collembola. Jan Willem |
|
|
cthirion |
Posted on 27-08-2006 22:56
|
Member Location: Awirs (Flémalle) Belgique Posts: 901 Joined: 13.08.04 |
On this photograph, number 4 has parts of different density on the body, the collemboles are more uniform in their structure............... but here it is very small, I am not sure! ? ?Strong dish for collemboles! ? cthirion |
jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 27-08-2006 23:23
|
Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9295 Joined: 05.06.06 |
cthirion wrote: On this photograph, number 4 has parts of different density on the body, the collemboles are more uniform in their structure............... but here it is very small, I am not sure! ? ?Strong dish for collemboles! ? the collembolan are very similar to this: http://www.geocities.com/fransjanssens/images/hopkin/2002/neanorum.jpg I saw it with a small loupe... |
cthirion |
Posted on 27-08-2006 23:33
|
Member Location: Awirs (Flémalle) Belgique Posts: 901 Joined: 13.08.04 |
You see, not zone of shade on all the body! ? ?At the thrips, one sees the wings lying on the back! ? ?on your photograph, one sees zones of shade! ? ?But as long as I would not have a specimen seen under the magnifying glass........! ? cthirion |
jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 28-08-2006 09:48
|
Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9295 Joined: 05.06.06 |
Oh... I see. The right one.. has a black spot... it's dust! ) The fine pelicule of water is not so clean... |
LordV |
Posted on 05-09-2006 12:22
|
Member Location: Posts: 671 Joined: 06.09.05 |
My guesses would be 1. Rove beetle 3. Weevil 4.wasp ? Brian V. |
|
|
jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 05-09-2006 13:12
|
Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9295 Joined: 05.06.06 |
LordV wrote: My guesses would be 1. Rove beetle 3. Weevil 4.wasp ? Brian V. Hi Brian 4 never could be a wasp, 100% sure. I know this photo is not great. But I'm sure about this. This is indeed a collembolan. 3- seems more like a mite. Really I?m not sure about 3., indeed. Thanks! |
Jan Willem |
Posted on 05-09-2006 13:29
|
Member Location: Waalwijk, The Netherlands Posts: 2136 Joined: 24.07.04 |
Hi Jorge, 3 is Acari, no doubt! Jan Willem |
|
|
LordV |
Posted on 06-09-2006 10:19
|
Member Location: Posts: 671 Joined: 06.09.05 |
As a complete coincidence think I shot the same type of mite this morning (3) under 4:1 Brian V. |
|
|
jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 06-09-2006 11:08
|
Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9295 Joined: 05.06.06 |
LordV wrote: As a complete coincidence think I shot the same type of mite this morning (3) under 4:1 Brian V. wow!!! This is incredible! Fantastic "Micro" world!!! Acari with two red spots... and a very tiny insect. Edited by jorgemotalmeida on 06-09-2006 11:10 |
Tony Irwin |
Posted on 06-09-2006 15:15
|
Member Location: Norwich, England Posts: 7232 Joined: 19.11.04 |
Brian - I think this has got to be the best shot of a predatory mite in action I have ever seen. I raise my pooter to you!
Tony ---------- Tony Irwin |
|
|
Jan Willem |
Posted on 06-09-2006 15:30
|
Member Location: Waalwijk, The Netherlands Posts: 2136 Joined: 24.07.04 |
What about its victim, is it a psocopteran? Jan Willem |
|
|
LordV |
Posted on 06-09-2006 19:32
|
Member Location: Posts: 671 Joined: 06.09.05 |
Thanks Tony- I didn't realise these were predatory- thought it was just an opportunist, I have a few mmore shots of it as well . Jan yes think it is a bark louse it's eating. Brian V. |
|
|
Tony Irwin |
Posted on 06-09-2006 22:18
|
Member Location: Norwich, England Posts: 7232 Joined: 19.11.04 |
Yes, the Bdellidae are important mite predators. One species has been used in Tasmania for control of the "Lucerne Flea" - a destructive collembollan. Your photo shows the silk threads with which these mites tie down their prey before feeding. An astonishing photo, reminiscent of some of the early screenshots from "Half-life" - (you may need to ask a gaming geek for an explanation - show them the image, and they'll know what I mean!) Tony ---------- Tony Irwin |
|
Page 1 of 2: 12
Jump to Forum: |