Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 41

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 5,057
· Newest Member: Wilko Scheeres
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Carnifex00:28:01
· Nosferatumyia00:57:06
· weia01:40:38
· John Carr01:47:57
· Juergen Peters02:25:40
· evdb03:07:20
· JWV04:02:36
· lema04:07:53
· Rupert Huber04:36:42
· skrylten04:43:32
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Sweden: Pseudolyciella, male (with genitalia)
viktor j nilsson
#1 Print Post
Posted on 12-01-2010 23:44
Member

Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 203
Joined: 25.02.08

Hey,

this time a male Pseudolyciella - either P. stylata, P. pallidiventris or P. subpallidiventris.

South of Sweden, the Island Öland. 1st-26th august.

I get terribly confused by the genitalia figures in Shatalkin (2000).
From the illustration, the cerci and paramere of P. stylata looks monstrous - long, straight and narrow like needles! Although Shatalkin´s figure is drawn laterally and my picture of the genitalia is from ventral side, I just can´t accept that this could be P.stylata. But nonetheless - I can only see a single paramere lobe, and subpallidiventris and pallidiventris is supposed to have "lobes of parameres subequal in length". What am I missing?
Thanks,

Viktor
viktor j nilsson attached the following image:


[70.03Kb]
Edited by viktor j nilsson on 12-01-2010 23:48
 
viktor j nilsson
#2 Print Post
Posted on 12-01-2010 23:44
Member

Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 203
Joined: 25.02.08

genitalia
viktor j nilsson attached the following image:


[97.11Kb]
 
Paul Beuk
#3 Print Post
Posted on 13-01-2010 00:10
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Netherlands
Posts: 19403
Joined: 11.05.04

This would indeed be P. stylata but I have experienced on several occasions that the relative lenghts of the parameres are variable. Shatalkin's figure for stylata appears to show the at maximum length difference. As there still is no reliable character to separate females I have the uncanny feeling that it is still possible that these group of three species represents just one single species with variation in the relative lengths of the parameres.
Paul

- - - -

Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info
 
diptera.info
viktor j nilsson
#4 Print Post
Posted on 13-01-2010 23:58
Member

Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 203
Joined: 25.02.08

Ouch, yeah this seems like a real mess. Now that you mention this I think I remember that I have read about this somewhere else on this forum. In Merz´s paper on the Fallén types I am intrigued to read that individuals of all three "species" are represented in Fallén´s type series of P, pallidiventris!

Would be really cool to look deeper into this variation - maybe this is a sign of an evolutionary arms race between the sexes in different populations, or if there are just loads of widespread variation in genital shape between three closely related species?
Edited by viktor j nilsson on 13-01-2010 23:59
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Brachystoma vesiculosum<- Empididae male Diptera (adults) 3 24-08-2025 08:39
male Eupeodes luniger? --> confirmed Syrphidae 6 22-08-2025 19:53
Dicrotendipes sp male id help Diptera (adults) 2 20-08-2025 21:18
Linnaemya male? (10.08.25) --> Linnaemya picta Diptera (adults) 7 19-08-2025 09:24
Tabanidae - male - north-western France > Atylotus rusticus Diptera (adults) 11 15-08-2025 14:08
Date and time
25 August 2025 01:07
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

24.08.25 16:55
Thanks for your proposal, but for me this option is ineligible.

15.08.25 10:15
For those specialists not active on Facebook, I just ask to consider to join our group on FB. Please, be aware that it is not necessary at all to be active on FB outside the diptera group. Actually, n

15.08.25 10:13
We received requests to get permission to ask for ID in our Facebook group, https://www.facebo
ok.com/groups/1798
95332035235/ Until now we pointed to diptera.info, but since Paul's passing we not

23.06.25 18:10
If you have some spare money, there is a copy (together with keys to pupae and larvae) for sale by Hermann L. Strack, Loguivy Plougras, France

23.06.25 11:18
Appreciate it, Tony Irwin! I got the hint to use the key next to Langton and Pinder key for females of Chironomidae. So no specific queries, except the keys... I will keep this on my list and hope th

19.06.25 15:33
I have the hard copy book, if you have any specific queries, but I'm not scanning the 500+ pages!

02.06.25 18:26
Anyone has "Chironomidae of the Holarctic region. Keys and diagnoses. Part 3. Adult Males Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement 34"? smolwaarneming@gma
il.com

28.05.25 20:57
I have Russian Coenosia. nikita6510@ya.ru

28.05.25 12:25
Is someone able to share with me "A key to the Russian species of the genus Coenosia"?

08.05.25 18:22
I have

Render time: 2.03 seconds | 237,831,181 unique visits