Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 270

· Members Online: 1
olep

· Total Members: 4,994
· Newest Member: Phengaris
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· olepOnline
· smol00:09:30
· weia00:13:59
· Woodmen00:40:24
· John Carr00:40:42
· ESant02:31:14
· evdb03:13:12
· Volkmar03:37:43
· kuv04:19:48
· Nacho Cabellos04:29:57
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Sweden: Pseudolyciella, male (with genitalia)
viktor j nilsson
#1 Print Post
Posted on 12-01-2010 23:44
Member

Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 203
Joined: 25.02.08

Hey,

this time a male Pseudolyciella - either P. stylata, P. pallidiventris or P. subpallidiventris.

South of Sweden, the Island Öland. 1st-26th august.

I get terribly confused by the genitalia figures in Shatalkin (2000).
From the illustration, the cerci and paramere of P. stylata looks monstrous - long, straight and narrow like needles! Although Shatalkin´s figure is drawn laterally and my picture of the genitalia is from ventral side, I just can´t accept that this could be P.stylata. But nonetheless - I can only see a single paramere lobe, and subpallidiventris and pallidiventris is supposed to have "lobes of parameres subequal in length". What am I missing?
Thanks,

Viktor
viktor j nilsson attached the following image:


[70.03Kb]
Edited by viktor j nilsson on 12-01-2010 23:48
 
viktor j nilsson
#2 Print Post
Posted on 12-01-2010 23:44
Member

Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 203
Joined: 25.02.08

genitalia
viktor j nilsson attached the following image:


[97.11Kb]
 
Paul Beuk
#3 Print Post
Posted on 13-01-2010 00:10
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Netherlands
Posts: 19383
Joined: 11.05.04

This would indeed be P. stylata but I have experienced on several occasions that the relative lenghts of the parameres are variable. Shatalkin's figure for stylata appears to show the at maximum length difference. As there still is no reliable character to separate females I have the uncanny feeling that it is still possible that these group of three species represents just one single species with variation in the relative lengths of the parameres.
Paul

- - - -

Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info
 
diptera.info
viktor j nilsson
#4 Print Post
Posted on 13-01-2010 23:58
Member

Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 203
Joined: 25.02.08

Ouch, yeah this seems like a real mess. Now that you mention this I think I remember that I have read about this somewhere else on this forum. In Merz´s paper on the Fallén types I am intrigued to read that individuals of all three "species" are represented in Fallén´s type series of P, pallidiventris!

Would be really cool to look deeper into this variation - maybe this is a sign of an evolutionary arms race between the sexes in different populations, or if there are just loads of widespread variation in genital shape between three closely related species?
Edited by viktor j nilsson on 13-01-2010 23:59
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Pollenia male genitalia--> Pollenia rudis (♂) Diptera (adults) 7 03-12-2024 10:36
Chironomidae/Orthocladinae male Diptera (adults) 2 05-11-2024 21:24
Pseudolyciella sp. <-- Lauxaniidae ID Diptera (adults) 2 05-11-2024 09:06
Tachinidae: male Zeuxia cinerea? Diptera (adults) 3 28-10-2024 12:40
A male Forcipomya sp.?->Yes, subg. Forcipomya prob. Diptera (adults) 3 26-10-2024 15:20
Date and time
19 January 2025 18:09
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

19.12.24 12:33
Received missing pages from @royensoc.co.uk, free download available for a few days: https://we.tl/t-vk
a2lFLsYU

17.12.24 23:03
Downloaded the British Handbook Diptera: Bibionid and Scatopsidae flies but pages 58, 59, 67, 68 are missing. Anybody has a complete copy?

08.11.24 16:10
Www.abebooks.com

29.07.24 13:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 11:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 12:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 15:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 13:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 13:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 11:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

Render time: 0.53 seconds | 208,255,011 unique visits