Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Pinned Chamaepsila nigricornis / rosae, Psilidae
|
|
| JariF |
Posted on 02-06-2009 17:53
|
 Member Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 2072 Joined: 20.01.06 |
Hi, is Chamaepsila correct ? June 2.2009 Loviisa, Finland. Jari JariF attached the following image:  [176.66Kb] Edited by JariF on 11-06-2009 08:12 |
|
|
|
| JariF |
Posted on 09-06-2009 14:05
|
|
Member Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 2072 Joined: 20.01.06 |
Once more Jari |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 09-06-2009 15:34
|
 Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19326 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Chamaepsila is correct
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
 |
|
| JariF |
Posted on 09-06-2009 19:27
|
|
Member Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 2072 Joined: 20.01.06 |
Thank You Paul. Must find the species name tomorrow  Jari |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 09-06-2009 20:06
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19326 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Most likely one of the rosae / nigricornis couple. C. pectoralis might be possible (don't expect this one to be it) but the the part of the thiorax above the fore legs (here hidden) should be yellow rather than black.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| JariF |
Posted on 11-06-2009 08:11
|
|
Member Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 2072 Joined: 20.01.06 |
Yes, that's what it is. As far as I know the females are not possible to separate from each other so I will add this picture as nigricornis/rosae. Jari |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
