Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 20

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,988
· Newest Member: DedeLab
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Juergen Peters02:16:07
· nowaytofly02:52:23
· smol03:18:11
· weia04:45:06
· evdb05:27:36
· ESant06:16:06
· Volker06:50:35
· Oryctes07:16:32
· Nosferatumyia07:37:39
· Raimo07:52:46
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Lauxaniidae??
Rafael Estevez
#1 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 17:05
Member

Location: Vigo (Spain)
Posts: 242
Joined: 21.08.07

Tiny fly, not more that 3mm., found in a very humid habitat on a river bank in between high fens.
Novmber 11th 2007 river Sil Canyon (LUGO9 at 220 mts. deciduous forest.-
Thanks for ID.
Rafael
Rafael Estevez attached the following image:


[178.51Kb]
 
jorgemotalmeida
#2 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 17:08
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

great, great photo!!!
Edited by jorgemotalmeida on 18-11-2007 17:25
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
Paul Beuk
#3 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 20:21
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Netherlands
Posts: 19363
Joined: 11.05.04

Mist probably Homoneura but impossible to say for certain without a better view of the wing.
Paul

- - - -

Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info
 
diptera.info
cosmln
#4 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 20:28
User Avatar

Member

Location: Romania
Posts: 956
Joined: 18.03.07

Rafael Estevez wrote:
Tiny fly, not more that 3mm., found in a very humid habitat on a river bank in between high fens.
Novmber 11th 2007 river Sil Canyon (LUGO9 at 220 mts. deciduous forest.-
Thanks for ID.
Rafael


Hi Rafael,

i'm coming again with the question:
if possible to say something about your photo technic, photo gear?
lens/camera/flash yes or no/tripod yes or no...

again a great photo,
cosmln
 
http://mybiosis.org/nature/portal.php?pagename=firstpage
jorgemotalmeida
#5 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 20:32
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

He uses a long focal length lense. Smile Sigma APO 150 mm (very good lense and expensive).
the material you can see here: http://www.fotona...chas/2030/ Grin
See equipo (equipment in Spanish).
The photos are one of the best I've ever seen - butterflies and birds and some odonata.

see this Grin http://www.fotona...tos/69561/
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
jorgemotalmeida
#6 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 20:34
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

C?mara Canon EOS 1 DMark III WOW! great camera!


Very soon it is possible to get a MPE lens Grin Grin
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
cosmln
#7 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 20:42
User Avatar

Member

Location: Romania
Posts: 956
Joined: 18.03.07

jorgemotalmeida wrote:
He uses a long focal length lense. Smile Sigma APO 150 mm (very good lense and expensive).
the material you can see here: http://www.fotona...chas/2030/ Grin
See equipo (equipment in Spanish).
The photos are one of the best I've ever seen - butterflies and birds and some odonata.

see this Grin http://www.fotona...tos/69561/


hi Jorge,

i have the same lens and just buyed a new camera (40D) hope that i will try that one in the field next week.
Canon MP-E 65 will be my next lens.

now i know the gear i'm really interested in the technic he use.

thanks for this for now,
cosmln
 
http://mybiosis.org/nature/portal.php?pagename=firstpage
jorgemotalmeida
#8 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 20:49
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

canon 40D is the next camera after mine canon 30D. It appeared in August this year. The review I read seems to approve the camera. Smile I have a friend of mine that will buy a canon 40D too..

Canon MPE-65 is rather hard to use! Not just lightning issues but handling it. Wink I have a similar setup when I reversed a 50 mm lens on my Sigma 105 mm and it is not easy. You can see some photos here: www.flickr.com/om.... They are all mine.
I advice to buy a Tamron 90 mm instead a Sigma 105 mm lens, it is a little better (ok, the working distance is a little smaller) because delivers crystalline photos.
I use usually jpg format, but the RAW files are much better because there is no lack of information. jpg file compacts the information, and it has the disadvantage to loose some quality.


The first lens I will get it is a MPE-65 mm and then maybe a Sigma APO 150 mm. Smile
Edited by jorgemotalmeida on 18-11-2007 21:07
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
cosmln
#9 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 22:56
User Avatar

Member

Location: Romania
Posts: 956
Joined: 18.03.07

jorgemotalmeida wrote:
He uses a long focal length lense. Smile Sigma APO 150 mm (very good lense and expensive).
the material you can see here: http://www.fotona...chas/2030/ Grin
See equipo (equipment in Spanish).
The photos are one of the best I've ever seen - butterflies and birds and some odonata.

see this Grin http://www.fotona...tos/69561/


Hi Jorge,

i think you are wrong, the correct link to Rafael Estevez (Rafael Estevez Rodriguez) page is:
http://www.fotonatura.org/miembros/fichas/7957/
and a gallery at:
http://www.fotonatura.org/galerias/1205/

hi have a complete different gear, mainly Nikon.

the link you have gave is from another person.

still waiting from Rafael to say something about his technic (if he want).

cosmln
 
http://mybiosis.org/nature/portal.php?pagename=firstpage
jorgemotalmeida
#10 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 23:22
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

yep. you are right. again Wink
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
crex
#11 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 23:24
User Avatar

Member

Location: Sweden
Posts: 1996
Joined: 22.05.06

No, gallery is at http://www.fotonatura.org/galerias/3946/ Grin

I think it is his excellent lighting technique that makes the photos special.
 
crex
#12 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 23:28
User Avatar

Member

Location: Sweden
Posts: 1996
Joined: 22.05.06

I have the same Sigma ring flash (on Canon) and I think it sucks (or maybe I don't know how to use it) Sad
 
cosmln
#13 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 23:31
User Avatar

Member

Location: Romania
Posts: 956
Joined: 18.03.07

jorgemotalmeida wrote:
yep. you are right. again Wink


just partly

crex wrote:
No, gallery is at http://www.fotonatura.org/galerias/3946/ Grin

I think it is his excellent lighting technique that makes the photos special.


yes crex you are right, wrong copy/paste Smile

crex wrote:
I have the same Sigma ring flash (on Canon) and I think it sucks (or maybe I don't know how to use it) Sad


in one month i hope i will have one too Smile
just waiting

cosmln
 
http://mybiosis.org/nature/portal.php?pagename=firstpage
jorgemotalmeida
#14 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 23:34
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

ring flash turn the light in someway "hard". more darker... awkward
the better is to have a very good diffuser. Smile
With MPE I will not use ring flash.
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
crex
#15 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 23:37
User Avatar

Member

Location: Sweden
Posts: 1996
Joined: 22.05.06

We should perhaps discuss photo matters in another thread. In larger magnifications a ring flash doesn't work well with the MP-E 65. The focal distance is so short that the flash gets in the way ...
 
jorgemotalmeida
#16 Print Post
Posted on 18-11-2007 23:41
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

one very good example of use MPE and no ring flash Grin

http://www.flickr...ts/590338/
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
Xespok
#17 Print Post
Posted on 19-11-2007 00:35
User Avatar

Member

Location: Debrecen, Hungary
Posts: 5550
Joined: 02.03.05

jorgemotalmeida wrote:
ring flash turn the light in someway "hard". more darker... awkward
the better is to have a very good diffuser. Smile
With MPE I will not use ring flash.


I also got a SLR with a 105mm Sigma Macro and a Ring flash. Right now I am experimenting with it. I also found that many times the flash is too hard, particularly in low light situations, and when the TTL program can not judge the light conditions right.

I think it is a good idea to set the flash intendisty to -1. It consistently gives better results, it is much easier to compensate for low light in photoshop than get rid of overexposure.

I think I'll try to attach a sheet of fine paper or a greyish foil on the top of the flash to get a more diffused light. I think it will do the job. I'll experiment around with the flash in winter.
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
jorgemotalmeida
#18 Print Post
Posted on 19-11-2007 01:06
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

try the famous diffuser of Brian - (lordv) made from... coca-cola cans. Frown


See here Grin --
http://www.flickr...312315664/
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
cosmln
#19 Print Post
Posted on 19-11-2007 02:23
User Avatar

Member

Location: Romania
Posts: 956
Joined: 18.03.07

jorgemotalmeida wrote:
try the famous diffuser of Brian - (lordv) made from... coca-cola cans. Frown


See here Grin --
http://www.flickr...312315664/


first of all sorry for all OT on this thread (maybe Paul will move partly in other section).

on macro ring you can't use that diffuser.

cosmln
 
http://mybiosis.org/nature/portal.php?pagename=firstpage
jorgemotalmeida
#20 Print Post
Posted on 19-11-2007 02:39
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9295
Joined: 05.06.06

this is precisely the diffuser that Brian use with MPE (even for 5x magnification.) Smile Much better than ring flash... that has the problems crex appointed. Smile

yep. it would be better to have another thread. Smile
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Lauxaniidae - Calliopum tuberculosum Diptera (adults) 4 08-11-2024 11:13
Lauxaniidae: Homoneura sp. Diptera (adults) 5 05-11-2024 19:08
Pseudolyciella sp. <-- Lauxaniidae ID Diptera (adults) 2 05-11-2024 10:06
Lauxaniidae Sapromyzosoma Diptera (adults) 5 26-10-2024 00:40
Lauxaniidae Diptera (adults) 10 22-10-2024 09:40
Date and time
22 November 2024 06:10
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

21.11.24 04:50
I can no longer send private messages (and maybe not receive?), even though my inbox and outbox are not yet full. I write, click "send" and they disappear and never show up in the outbox.

08.11.24 17:10
Www.abebooks.com

29.07.24 14:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 12:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 13:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 16:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 14:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 14:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 12:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 09:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

Render time: 3.10 seconds | 204,607,388 unique visits