Posted by Juergen Peters on 12-07-2018 22:03
#8
piros wrote:
May be I am misstaken, but I think I can see a long proboscis in these pics, which would leave only Conop as a possible genus.
That's why I excluded
Conops at first: I could not find one. I was accustomed to see it instantly in that genus (
C. quadrifasciatus is rather abundant here). But you may be right and it is only badly visible on theese two not so good photos. I will store them as
Conops flavipes, if nobody disagrees. Thank you!