Posted by cosmln on 11-09-2007 14:53
#11
Isidro wrote:
I add: it's probably thatt the second was not Argiope bruennichii but Argiope trifasciata. A dorsal view can confirm it.
i never seen
A.trifasciata (from what i know is not present in romania) but for sure this is not.
A.bruennichi, i have seen thousen of individual and...
in romania also
A.lobata (much much more rare than
bruennichi), again completely different. so you have to see in your species what is in plus there :D
cosmln