Posted by Nosferatumyia on 23-05-2010 21:16
#10
Dear Paul:
Sorry in advance if I am unaware of some recent phylogenetic studies those prove para- or polyphyly
Palloptera, Toxoneura and Temnosira. I live in the country of no Zoological Record subscription.
Unless a revision with a good cladistics is done, further lumping-splitting activity hardly would be a good idea. Until polyphyly is proven, nomenclatural stability is the only sound reason to keep on using the practical "key classification" of J.F.McAlpine and B.Merz.
So far, I only know Ho-Yeon Han's 12S, 16S and COII mit DNA sequences for 3 Far East species on GenBank, which show nothing.
I am looking forward to see any references to the modern pallopterid cladistics.
Thank you in advance.
Edited by Nosferatumyia on 23-05-2010 21:38