Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Bibionidae, Bibio varipes, male

Posted by NakaRB on 09-02-2021 19:39
#1

Russia, Moscow region, 16.05.2020

live.staticflickr.com/65535/50584398231_312d9a16eb_c.jpg

live.staticflickr.com/65535/50584520217_312fb66d86_c.jpg

Edited by NakaRB on 10-02-2021 20:13

Posted by Zeegers on 10-02-2021 07:40
#2

First impression is male B. johannis, but legs are a bit dark....

Theo

Posted by eklans on 10-02-2021 10:12
#3

What about B. varipes?

Eric

Posted by Zeegers on 10-02-2021 12:08
#4

Varipes has light hairs on abdomen.These look black, but I am not sure.

Theo

Posted by Zeegers on 10-02-2021 12:12
#5

Elongated hind metatars would support varipes, as would the date.

Posted by eklans on 10-02-2021 12:42
#6

Bibionidae males key in Vliegenmepper 1997:
2b Borststukrug grotendeels zwart behaard -> 9
9 Schenen met helder rood -> 10
10 Metatars 3 slank, ongeveer 4 x zo lang als breed -> varipes

Greetings, Eric

Posted by Zeegers on 10-02-2021 16:48
#7

Must be an excellent key 🤪🤠🍰🥂🥂

Posted by eklans on 10-02-2021 17:04
#8

Indeed, it is! |t

Posted by NakaRB on 10-02-2021 20:13
#9

Thank you!

Posted by John Carr on 11-02-2021 15:55
#10

eklans wrote:
Bibionidae males key in Vliegenmepper 1997:
2b Borststukrug grotendeels zwart behaard -> 9
9 Schenen met helder rood -> 10
10 Metatars 3 slank, ongeveer 4 x zo lang als breed -> varipes

Greetings, Eric


I would pick "niet noemenswaardig lichter" over "helder rood" in couplet 9, but I end at the same species: "Bibio varipes var. atripes."

In America some of the common species of Bibio have several synonyms due to variation in leg color.

Posted by eklans on 11-02-2021 16:03
#11

|t

Posted by Zeegers on 12-02-2021 08:50
#12

Yes, this “atripes” variation is confusing, hence the doubled key-out.
Note that all intermediates do occur.
( meaning: the question whether or not this is atripes, is ill-defined)

Theo