Posted by weia on 22-01-2021 18:46
#2
Psychoda is correct. Apart from male genitalia only an extremely good picture of the top segments of the antenna could lead to more specific ID.
Posted by victorengel on 24-01-2021 01:52
#3
weia wrote:
Psychoda is correct. Apart from male genitalia only an extremely good picture of the top segments of the antenna could lead to more specific ID.
I think I collected this one. Is it numbers and orientation of hairs on the antennae I should be trying to capture?
