Thread subject: Diptera.info :: [Agria sp.] Head of Sarcophaga

Posted by pierred on 22-09-2007 07:24
#1

Hello,

I even managed to get the head of this Sarcophaga sp. reasonnably sharp, but in vivo.
Just for the fun.

Edited by pierred on 11-12-2007 08:48

Posted by jorgemotalmeida on 22-09-2007 11:43
#2

great photo, pierred. ;) tr?s bien!


I took another one... but for these kind of photos, Black is the master.

Posted by Liekele Sijstermans on 01-10-2007 11:43
#3

I doubt this is Sarcophaga sp. Do you have pictures of thorax and abdomen?

Liekele

Posted by pierred on 02-10-2007 07:40
#4

Liekele,

Here is a picture of the whole fly.

Posted by Liekele Sijstermans on 03-10-2007 10:30
#5

This is a female of Agria (Sarcophagidae, Paramacronychiinae).

In Europe three species. For identification we need to investigate / dissect the postabdomen.
If the specimen has been bred, hostname might help further identification.

Liekele

Posted by jorgemotalmeida on 03-10-2007 10:39
#6

Paramacronychiinae, is this subfamily parasitoid??? :|
Definitely flies are amazing! :D

Posted by Liekele Sijstermans on 03-10-2007 12:51
#7

Is this subfamily parasitoid?

Some of them are, some aren't. But I assume this subfamily to be paraphyletic.

For example:
Agria is parasitoid on lepidoptera and some symphyta.
Some Brachicoma in nests of Bombus.
Sarcotachina on eggs of Acridoidea.
Nyctia from snails.
Wohlfahrtia nekrophag, myiasis or parasite of mammals.

Liekele

Posted by Xespok on 03-10-2007 13:40
#8

Liekele, what features made you think that this is not a Sarcophaginae fly. I would have classed this a Sarcophaga sp without hesitation. It appears that the situation is far more complex than I thought.

Posted by pierred on 04-10-2007 06:48
#9

Hello,

Well, Gabor took the words out of my mouth...

Xespok wrote:
I would have classed this a Sarcophaga sp without hesitation. It appears that the situation is far more complex than I thought.


Thanks for the identification as Agria sp.. The fly was not collected.

Edited by pierred on 04-10-2007 06:49

Posted by pierred on 11-12-2007 08:48
#10

Hello,

I'm sorting some older photos and looking at this Sarcophagidae, I'm asking myself if it could not be another Agria sp.

Posted by Zeegers on 12-12-2007 19:53
#11

No, this is clearly a Sarcophaga s.l.

Very difficult to explain why.The bristles on the parafacialia are differently placed, the face is yellowish (whitish is very unusual in Sarcophaga) and the abdomen is more elongated, whereas Agria is slightly more Muscid-like.
Agreed, all very subtle.


Theo

Posted by Tony Irwin on 13-12-2007 02:22
#12

I've been losing sleep over this one - :(
I'm really not convinced that this is an Agria. Pierre's photos show a fly that is quite unlike the Agria in http://www.dipter...ad_id=8185 (which I am happy is an Agria). Pape clearly states that Agria has black occipital and postgenal hairs, which this clearly doesn't. I suspect Pierre's fly is a male (look at those pulvilli!) Sarcophaga (Bercaea) africa. I shall be away for a few days, so shall be interested to see what opinions there are on my return! :)

Edited by Tony Irwin on 13-12-2007 02:23

Posted by pierred on 13-12-2007 07:34
#13

Hello,

Thanks to both of you for your comments.

Posted by zcuc on 13-12-2007 10:39
#14

The thorax looks a bit bald?
In my recent S.africa it has few long bristles on it. Is it just a photo problem?

Posted by Liekele Sijstermans on 13-12-2007 13:17
#15

I've been losing sleep over this one -
I'm really not convinced that this is an Agria. ... Pape clearly states that Agria has black occipital and postgenal hairs, which this clearly doesn't.


Now I feel guilty. You're right, this is not Agria. I was mistaken by calling it Agria. It is Sarcophaginae after all. But I do not know which one without genitalia.

. I suspect Pierre's fly is a male (look at those pulvilli!) Sarcophaga (Bercaea) africa.[/


Maybe. It is not Agria. And it is different from first specimen with beautifull picture of head.

Liekele

Posted by pierred on 14-12-2007 08:12
#16

Hello,

Don't be sorry, all of you.
I'm the only culprit, having thought that this could be the same species.