Thread subject: Diptera.info :: [Agria sp.] Head of Sarcophaga
Posted by pierred on 22-09-2007 06:24
#1
Hello,
I even managed to get the head of this
Sarcophaga sp. reasonnably sharp, but in vivo.
Just for the fun.
Edited by pierred on 11-12-2007 07:48
Posted by jorgemotalmeida on 22-09-2007 10:43
#2
great photo, pierred. ;) tr?s bien!
I took another one... but for these kind of photos, Black is the master.
Posted by Liekele Sijstermans on 01-10-2007 10:43
#3
I doubt this is Sarcophaga sp. Do you have pictures of thorax and abdomen?
Liekele
Posted by pierred on 02-10-2007 06:40
#4
Liekele,
Here is a picture of the whole fly.
Posted by Liekele Sijstermans on 03-10-2007 09:30
#5
This is a female of Agria (Sarcophagidae, Paramacronychiinae).
In Europe three species. For identification we need to investigate / dissect the postabdomen.
If the specimen has been bred, hostname might help further identification.
Liekele
Posted by jorgemotalmeida on 03-10-2007 09:39
#6
Paramacronychiinae, is this subfamily parasitoid??? :|
Definitely flies are amazing! :D
Posted by Liekele Sijstermans on 03-10-2007 11:51
#7
Is this subfamily parasitoid?
Some of them are, some aren't. But I assume this subfamily to be paraphyletic.
For example:
Agria is parasitoid on lepidoptera and some symphyta.
Some Brachicoma in nests of Bombus.
Sarcotachina on eggs of Acridoidea.
Nyctia from snails.
Wohlfahrtia nekrophag, myiasis or parasite of mammals.
Liekele
Posted by Xespok on 03-10-2007 12:40
#8
Liekele, what features made you think that this is not a Sarcophaginae fly. I would have classed this a Sarcophaga sp without hesitation. It appears that the situation is far more complex than I thought.
Posted by pierred on 04-10-2007 05:48
#9
Hello,
Well, Gabor took the words out of my mouth...
Xespok wrote:
I would have classed this a Sarcophaga sp without hesitation. It appears that the situation is far more complex than I thought.
Thanks for the identification as
Agria sp.. The fly was not collected.
Edited by pierred on 04-10-2007 05:49
Posted by pierred on 11-12-2007 07:48
#10
Hello,
I'm sorting some older photos and looking at this Sarcophagidae, I'm asking myself if it could not be another
Agria sp.
Posted by Zeegers on 12-12-2007 18:53
#11
No, this is clearly a Sarcophaga s.l.
Very difficult to explain why.The bristles on the parafacialia are differently placed, the face is yellowish (whitish is very unusual in Sarcophaga) and the abdomen is more elongated, whereas Agria is slightly more Muscid-like.
Agreed, all very subtle.
Theo
Posted by Tony Irwin on 13-12-2007 01:22
#12
I've been losing sleep over this one - :(
I'm really not convinced that this is an
Agria. Pierre's photos show a fly that is quite unlike the
Agria in
http://www.dipter...ad_id=8185 (which I am happy is an
Agria). Pape clearly states that
Agria has black occipital and postgenal hairs, which this clearly doesn't. I suspect Pierre's fly is a male (look at those pulvilli!)
Sarcophaga (
Bercaea)
africa. I shall be away for a few days, so shall be interested to see what opinions there are on my return! :)
Edited by Tony Irwin on 13-12-2007 01:23
Posted by pierred on 13-12-2007 06:34
#13
Hello,
Thanks to both of you for your comments.
Posted by zcuc on 13-12-2007 09:39
#14
The thorax looks a bit bald?
In my recent S.africa it has few long bristles on it. Is it just a photo problem?
Posted by Liekele Sijstermans on 13-12-2007 12:17
#15
I've been losing sleep over this one -
I'm really not convinced that this is an Agria. ... Pape clearly states that Agria has black occipital and postgenal hairs, which this clearly doesn't.
Now I feel guilty. You're right, this is not Agria. I was mistaken by calling it Agria. It is Sarcophaginae after all. But I do not know which one without genitalia.
. I suspect Pierre's fly is a male (look at those pulvilli!) Sarcophaga (Bercaea) africa.[/
Maybe. It is not Agria. And it is different from first specimen with beautifull picture of head.
Liekele
Posted by pierred on 14-12-2007 07:12
#16
Hello,
Don't be sorry, all of you.
I'm the only culprit, having thought that this could be the same species.