Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Tachinidae (1), July 10, 2007
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 11-07-2007 09:22
#1
Yesterday I've collected a lot of Tachinidae (mostly on leaves of young growth of
Salix/Betula/P. tremula, a power transmission line clearing). I decided to post only the flies that look different than ones I met before.
That one was caught on leaves of a young
P. tremula. Size 8 mm. Restless and quick flier.
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 11-07-2007 09:23
#2
The head.
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 11-07-2007 09:24
#3
A dorsal view.
Posted by ChrisR on 11-07-2007 12:13
#4
This is a really interesting fly - like nothing I have ever seen here. The eyes are huge but it obviously isn't
Carcelia; it has tiny antennae; most veins are hairy but it isn't an
Actia; and the depression on T1+2 doesn't reach the margin. I have run it through the Palaearctic genera key (software version) and it comes out to
Parhamaxia (Mesnil) - a new one for me. The Palaearctic Manual by Hans-Peter Tschorsnig & Vera A. Richter states:
3 spp.; South of Russian Far East; Mesnil 1944 - 1975: 1240 - 1242, Richter 1991: 234 - 236
Those references being:
Mesnil, L. P. 1944 - 1975. Larvaevorinae (Tachininae). In E. Lindner (ed.): Die Fliegen der pal?arktischen Region 64g: 1435 pp. Stuttgart.
Richter, V. A. 1991. A new tribe, new and little known species of the tachinid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) of the fauna of the USSR. Ent. Obozr. 70: 229 - 246.
So, with a bit of paper-searching you should be able to come up with a species-level identification! :)
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 11-07-2007 12:18
#5
Many thanks Chris - so I was right, it's pretty interesting - south of Far East, strange enough...
Posted by ChrisR on 11-07-2007 12:20
#6
Yes, I am not 100% confident and I'd appreciate Theo's experience here - but it is certainly a very interesting fly. I will pass the link to this thread to Peter Tschorsnig and see if he can comment on it too :)
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 11-07-2007 12:22
#7
OK great - remember I've got the specimen and will re-visit the place - I also have ventral views of abdomen - do you need these?
Posted by ChrisR on 11-07-2007 12:30
#8
I don't think so - the photos you have posted of this fly seem adequate for our purposes ... it is just so new to me and outside the quoted range of
Parhamaxia so I am keen to get an expert opinion, just in case it is a bad ID :)
I certainly wouldn't mind a few specimens though, if you find there are 100s more ;)
Edited by ChrisR on 11-07-2007 12:31
Posted by Tschorsnig on 11-07-2007 14:49
#9
It is a female of Halidaya aurea.
Best regards
Peter
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 11-07-2007 14:52
#10
Thank you very much Peter.