Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Blephariceridae, Philorus, Vietnam
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 08-01-2016 01:09
#1
2 males in alcohol, October 30, 2015, Vietnam, Lao Cai Prov., Sa Pa Distr., Ban Khoang env., 22.3872N, 103.7867E, 1682m a.s.l.
Wing length ca. 4.8mm. Antennae 14-segmented, long (ca. 2mm or 0.4 length of wing), first flagellomere the longest segment. Three ocelli present. Only hind tibiae with a spur-like setose appendage, longer than tibia width, or ca. two-thirds of tarsomere 5. Coxae not elongated, trochanters ventrally with black streaks, the longest ones on hind trochanters. General colouration brownish yellow, thoracic dorsum darker.
I moved from
Nepaletricha to
Hesperinidae to
Mycetobiidae, all rejected because of the present combination of characters.
Wings badly deformed in alcohol so here's my sketch, the venation is rather peculiar, I couldn't make out any of subcostal vein (too weak, too short?). Dotted lines show where veins (in my view at least) seemed evanescent, almost like folds.
[Subject changed from Nematocera, Vietnam - which family?? to Blephariceridae, Philorus, Vietnam. ID credits: Paul Beuk]
Edited by Dmitry Gavryushin on 08-01-2016 18:01
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 08-01-2016 01:10
#2
The head to show structure of palpi.
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 08-01-2016 01:10
#3
The spur on hind tibia.
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 08-01-2016 01:11
#4
Hind leg, tarsal claws.
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 08-01-2016 01:12
#5
Male genitalia, dorsal, lateral (not so good, just to get the general idea), and ventral views.
Posted by Paul Beuk on 08-01-2016 12:36
#6
General head shape reminds me of Ceratopogonidae but then the antennae are off. I asked Peter Chandler for his opinion.
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 08-01-2016 14:19
#7
Thanks Paul, yet I believe
Ceratopogonidae got no ocelli...
Posted by Paul Beuk on 08-01-2016 14:24
#8
And that is in addition to the wrong antennae. ;)
Posted by Paul Beuk on 08-01-2016 15:05
#9
Could you check against Blephariceridae (
Philorus)?
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 08-01-2016 17:04
#10
Well Paul I think you're quite right, elongated mouthparts, antennae of 13 to 15 segments, Sc rudimentary, hind tibiae with 1 or 2 spurs, male genitalia of similar structure. I omitted
Blephariceridae because in Stackelberg it is considered that vein C is developed in whole wing, while Courtney writes that C reaches only the apex of R5.
Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 08-01-2016 17:26
#11
I think the closest match is
Philorus assamensis (Tonnoir, 1930) [Notes on Indian blepharocerid larvae and pupae with remarks on the morphology of blepharocerid larvae and pupae in general. Records Indian Mus. 32(2), pp. 207-209], as
Euliponeura, synonimysed by Zwick in 1990. Couldn't find any proper records of Blephariceridae from Vietnam...
Posted by Jan on 08-01-2016 17:40
#12
Yes, I agree with Blephariceridae
Posted by Paul Beuk on 08-01-2016 18:05
#14
By the way, Zwick & Arefina (2005) establish there is a clearly monophyletic group within
Philorus for which the name
Euliponeura is available but recognizing it as a valid genus would render the remainder of
Philorus paraphyletic...