Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Stratiomyidae question
Posted by Calilasseia on 10-08-2015 04:42
#1
I've noticed that numerous members of the Stratiomyidae featured in the Gallery have backward pointing spines emanating from the scutellum. Is this feature diagnostic of this Family? Is the arrangement and number of spines considered by the experts to be diagnostic to Tribe or Genus level?
The reason I ask what some may consider to be an elementary question (I am after all an amateur Dipterist), is that in accounts of Stratiomyid taxonomy, I cannot recall seeing this feature being mentioned. Much is devoted towing venation and antennal structure (which of course are important diagnostic features for many taxa right across the Diptera), but I find it puzzling that a feature as easy to spot in the field as this, seems to have received no attention in the admittedly few examples of the literature I've read.
If a specialist in this clade can enlighten me, I'll be grateful. :)
Posted by rvanderweele on 10-08-2015 06:24
#2
The number of spines varies. Some have more than 2, some have 2 and some none at all. It is, thus, not diagnostic of the family.
Posted by Carlo Monari on 10-08-2015 08:21
#3
It is not diagnostic at family level, but it can be used, maybe with other characters, to separate subfamilies (e.g. more than 2 -> Beridinae).
Posted by rvanderweele on 10-08-2015 14:56
#4
Not all Beridinae have more than 2 spines, though this is valid in the UK. I know in Hungary, genus Allognosta has no spines at all. Anyway, in general it cannot be used as diagnostic in Europe.
Posted by Carlo Monari on 10-08-2015 22:32
#5
I agree; that character alone can't be used for a complete determination. But I would like to know if my previous statement is correct or not: in other words, are there Stratiomyidae with more than two spines on the scutellum which are not Beridinae? If yes, what I said is wrong, otherwise it is correct even if it does not characterize
all the Beridinae.
Posted by rvanderweele on 11-08-2015 17:12
#6
No, it is not correct. For example Antissa of subfamily Antissinae, which occurs in the neotropics, has also more than 4 spines. But also some Pachygasterinae have more than 2 spines on the scutellum
Posted by Carlo Monari on 11-08-2015 19:27
#7
Thanks Ruud. One last question: is it valid for some local faunas? I read that it should be valid for French and Italian Stratiomyidae, but now I am no more sure.
Posted by rvanderweele on 11-08-2015 19:35
#8
for some local fauna, sure! In the Netherlands yes. I guess also for France and Italy, but I am not 100% sure
Posted by Paul Beuk on 12-08-2015 11:04
#9
And there are other families with spines, too. Check, for example,
Coenomyia ferruginea...
Posted by Calilasseia on 13-08-2015 16:45
#10
And this is why I consult the experts. :)
Many thanks for illustrating this principle once again. I've learned several new pieces of data as a result. Keep up the good work everyone!