Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Hoverflies from Surrey, UK
Posted by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:37
#1
Any help would be appreciated, although I understand if it's not possible to ID some of them based on just a photo.
Possible
Eristalis species?
Edited by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:39
Posted by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:41
#2
And another...
Posted by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:43
#3
Possible Eupeodes luniger?
Edited by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:46
Posted by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:47
#4
Last one! Could this be
Cheilosia vernalis, or am I being a bit optimistic hoping for an ID to species level.
Posted by ChrisR on 23-04-2013 00:36
#5
Welcome to the forum Bill ... just a small tip though - it helps if you post each species in a different thread. Mixed threads can be confusing to follow and difficult to search for :)
Posted by billsbirding on 23-04-2013 01:14
#6
ChrisR wrote:
Welcome to the forum Bill ... just a small tip though - it helps if you post each species in a different thread. Mixed threads can be confusing to follow and difficult to search for :)
Apologies, Chris. I guess I'm just used to uploading photos in bulk to one post; thought it would be silly to clog up the forum with four different threads, but I'll take note for next time :)
Edited by billsbirding on 23-04-2013 01:14
Posted by jeremyr on 23-04-2013 08:47
#7
Hi Bill,
the first two flies are definitely
Eristalis as you can see the dipped vein. Pale front tarsi mark both out as
E. pertinax, the second fly looks like a hairy spring-brood specimen.
E. luniger looks probable but from this picture it's difficult to be certain, and I don't think there are that many
Cheilosia that can be readily identified from a picture
Jeremy
Edited by jeremyr on 23-04-2013 08:49
Posted by Fred Fly on 23-04-2013 08:49
#8
1 Eristalis pertinax
2 Eristalis pertinax
3 Eupeodes corollae
4 Platycheirus sp.