Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Brazilian Stratiomyidae #2 - ID Help

Posted by Antonio Carlos on 28-11-2012 16:36
#1

Another Stratiomyidae, that I belive to be a Raphiocera sp., and would be great if someone could confirm its ID, as also, identify the fly of my thread "Brazilian Stratiomyidae #1", that until now was not replied.

Photo #1
c1.staticflickr.com/9/8345/8222625806_8ab26716a1_o.jpg

Coordinates of the place where I took this photo:
Latitude: -22.538442719452, Longitude: -43.228293657303

Date and time:
December 1, 2011 at 9.41.04am GMT+3

Photo #2
c1.staticflickr.com/9/8483/8221540203_faed7d1807_b.jpg

Coordinates of the place where I took this photo:
Latitude: -22.538442719452, Longitude: -43.228293657303

Date and time:
December 1, 2011 at 9.41.44am GMT+3

Thanks for help!
AC

Edited by Antonio Carlos on 03-03-2016 00:08

Posted by Eric Fisher on 28-11-2012 19:48
#2

This beautiful fly is Heptozus sp. It is on the cover of this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Manual-Central-American-Diptera-v/dp/0660198339 .

Posted by John Carr on 29-11-2012 03:12
#3

The antennae are different. Are they highly variable within Heptozus? See thread 45072.

http://www.dipter...d_id=45072

Posted by Eric Fisher on 29-11-2012 08:38
#4

Ah, I didn't see that thread...thanks John. I need to follow ChrisR's advice and leave the strats alone!

I notice the coloration of the thorax is a bit different too. Since Steve Marshall's photo is ID'd as Heptozus sp., I assume there is some variation among the two presently known species of this genus (MCAD: 543). But this same source does mention Lysozus as a better alternative antenna-wise.

Posted by Antonio Carlos on 29-11-2012 16:03
#5

I found an article with nice pictures of this fly, where Diego Aguilar Fachin, from USP - Ribeirão Preto (SP) and João Paulo Morselli, from Department of Zoology, Insect Sistematic Laboratory, UNESP/Botucatu (SP), identified this fly as Raphiocera sp..

You can check the article here:

http://www.ra-bug...php?id=967

And the gallery with pictures here:

http://www.ra-bug...php?id=967

I would like to know what all of you have to say about this ID.
Thanks you all.
AC

Posted by John Carr on 29-11-2012 16:11
#6

I can see several minor differences in the fly in the article (different pale markings, C extended past tip of R5, indentation in dark patch at tip of R1 is triangular). I assume these make it a closely related species, but they could be sexual dimorphism, intraspecific variation, or even generic characters.

Posted by Antonio Carlos on 29-11-2012 19:51
#7

Thanks, John!
Now I see.

Posted by rlfalaschi on 02-02-2016 20:49
#8

Hi Antonio, the photos are not available...

Posted by Antonio Carlos on 03-03-2016 00:11
#9

rlfalaschi wrote:
Hi Antonio, the photos are not available...


Sorry!!
Now it is visible again.

Posted by Dmitry Gavryushin on 30-11-2016 16:27
#10

I'm inclined to consider this fly (as well as a similar Brazilian one elsewhere in the Forum) Raphiocera armata (Wiedemann). Fits imho the description in James, 1943 (Ann.Ent.Soc.Am. XXXVI: 376 as Basentidema coerulescens, sp.n.; synonymy in Pimentel&Pujol-Luz, 2001). Scape is not elongate so not a Heptozus (extralimital as well). As far as I know Lysozus Enderlein, 1914 mentioned here is a rather enigmatic genus.

Edited by Dmitry Gavryushin on 30-11-2016 16:27