Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Phoridae?
Posted by Benedikt on 29-11-2006 12:13
#1
Hello!
After looking at
Juergen's last flys I am inclined to assume that this specimen also belongs to this family (Phoridae), but as I am a newbie with flys I could of course be wrong. I found this 4mm fly yesterday night in my house (Bavaria, Germany).
Best wishes
Benedikt
Posted by jorgemotalmeida on 29-11-2006 12:30
#2
yes. see the peculiar hairy hind tibia. :)
wing venation typical! :)
and as I learn by Tony, some Phoridae can be have a long arista. :)
And more, the torax seems to be hump. :)
Posted by Robert Nash on 29-11-2006 13:19
#3
Go to
scuttle fly in the Glossary and follow the link for more info
Robert
EDIT Paul Beuk: Robert, if you use the [ glos ] button, you can link immediately to the Glossary term. ;)
Edited by Paul Beuk on 29-11-2006 13:50
Posted by Benedikt on 29-11-2006 21:23
#4
Thanks a lot for your quick replies!
Benedikt
Posted by Juergen Peters on 29-11-2006 22:43
#5
Hello, Robert!
Robert Nash wrote:
Go to
scuttle fly in the Glossary and follow the link for more info
In Germany this family is called "Buckelfliegen" (hump flies). That was one of the reasons, why I put the flies like the first one here
http://www.dipter...&pid=20019 into that family: much more hunchbacked than the new real Phorid in that thread...
Posted by Paul Beuk on 30-11-2006 00:12
#6
Actually, this might be one that can be named. I think it is a species of
Megaselia with numerous feather-like setae on the abdomen. I am not quite sure whether it was
rufipes or not, but I will check with my key tomorrow (if someone does not beat me to it ;)).
Posted by Paul Beuk on 30-11-2006 09:57
#7
Well, my memory did not desert me this time: I think this is
Megaselia rufipes.
Posted by Benedikt on 30-11-2006 22:18
#8
Paul Beuk wrote:
Well, my memory did not desert me this time: I think this is Megaselia rufipes.
Thanks, Paul!
Posted by Sabine Brenner on 13-12-2006 20:51
#9
Yes that is a very typical Megaselia species :D! Most Megaselias can not be identificated so easily! I am not sure about the sex, because the wings cover the hypopyg, but if my eyes do not mistake me it should be a male.
Best wishes
Sabine
Posted by bbrown on 05-01-2011 04:46
#10
Yes, M. rufipes.
Brian