Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Azelia male (continued)
Posted by Sundew on 10-06-2011 19:11
#1
Hi,
This small fly I saw in Austria, Tyrol, Niederthai (1.500 m) in last August. The only flies with such dotted abdomen I know belong to the Muscidae; however, the eyes of this male are strange. Anthomyiidae might be another option... Help, please!
Many thanks, Sundew
Edited by Sundew on 11-06-2011 19:24
Posted by Sundew on 10-06-2011 19:12
#2
More pics.
Posted by neprisikiski on 10-06-2011 19:31
#3
It is
Azelia sp.
Posted by Sundew on 10-06-2011 19:36
#4
Ah - a genus new for me - many thanks, Erikas! It resembles the male of thread
http://72.44.83.9...pid=135710, so perhaps
A. cilipes, too?
Posted by Stephane Lebrun on 10-06-2011 20:53
#5
I agree,
Azelia cilipes or
nebulosa. It is difficult to see whether it has a pd on t2 or not, or the number of av on t3.
Posted by Stephen R on 10-06-2011 20:59
#6
I thought I saw the pd (for
A. cilipes) in the first picture of post 2.
Posted by Stephane Lebrun on 10-06-2011 21:06
#7
I'm sure Claudia will find another photo showing it. ;)
Posted by Nikita Vikhrev on 10-06-2011 23:09
#8
cilipes and nebulosa usually have different abdominal pattern:
- lateral spots large, almost touch median spots -
nebulosa
- lateral spots small, well separated from median spots -
cilipes
This male has typical "cilipes" pattern.
Posted by Stephane Lebrun on 10-06-2011 23:21
#9
Thank you Nikita, it's a useful information. Is it also available for females ?
Azelia is a nightmare for me. I have many females undetermined because of the colour of the tibiae (can't make the difference between light brown ,brownish yellow etc.).
Posted by Nikita Vikhrev on 11-06-2011 09:35
#10
Stephane, I hear several doubts in one your question.
At my opinion:
1. In
West Palaearctic females nebulosa and cilipes seem reliably separated by t2 d preapical. (I hadn't checked female's abdominal pattern yet.)
2. Generally, keys for females aren't reliable at all even for Europe.
3. So far, I ignore females Azelia collected without males or label its as "collected with male of A. ..."
4. I have more than enough doubts in taxonomy of males, so I'm working on this problem as a first step.
Posted by Stephane Lebrun on 11-06-2011 17:51
#11
Thanks Nikita, I feel less alone now ! Indeed, it was not only about A. cilipes/nebulosa, but for the other females.
Posted by Sundew on 11-06-2011 19:19
#12
Now. this is a really hot discussion! Let's go on with males - you wanted me to show you some more legs :D. Here they are, though I am afraid the needed bristles might be less well visible. I am sorry I have no better legs to show (
Azelia concerned)...
Posted by Sundew on 11-06-2011 19:22
#13
However, Nikita's point to different spot patterns is very helpful for me. So I guess I found also a male of
A. nebulosa in the same place some days later. What do you say to this one?
Posted by Nikita Vikhrev on 12-06-2011 00:12
#14
1. The first new series of photos confirm our ID as
cilipes, see image attached.
2. I can say, that I'm happy that my character really separate these 2 species OK.
You are right, the second series is
nebulosa.
Edited by Nikita Vikhrev on 12-06-2011 11:07
Posted by Sundew on 12-06-2011 19:26
#15
Great - many thanks, Nikita!!