Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Tachinidae Campylochaeta praecox?
Posted by blowave on 25-12-2009 18:45
#1
Hi,
I need to get all my Tachinids or Tachinid look-alikes with a confirmed ID so I can send the records to Chris. Any help is much appreciated, but some of these are confusing as to which family they belong so please bear with me.;)
This one I got only one pic of on 14th April 2009 in my garden, a few miles south of Lincoln UK.
Greetings to all!
Janet :)
Posted by ChrisR on 26-12-2009 00:58
#2
Tricky - not a sarco this time (hairy eyes) but not
Campylocheta either ... but not sure what it could be because I can't see enough of the body :( (maybe
Phorocera?? - guess)
Here is a C.praecox that I had confirmed here recently :)
Edited by ChrisR on 26-12-2009 01:03
Posted by blowave on 26-12-2009 01:48
#3
I have cropped down to maximum magnification making two more pics which might help.
Posted by blowave on 26-12-2009 01:49
#4
bottom
Posted by Jaakko on 28-12-2009 21:32
#5
Phorocera gets my vote as well. It is difficult to see, but the m-vein seems to make a kink?
Posted by blowave on 28-12-2009 22:26
#6
Thanks Jaakko, if it's Phorocera sp. then it would narrow the choices down to two as we only have Phorocera obscura and P. assimilis in the UK.:)
Posted by Zeegers on 28-12-2009 22:56
#7
The facial ridge seems bare and the parafacialia hairy, if you have a very good look.
So my guess is Smidtia conspersa.
Theo
Posted by blowave on 28-12-2009 23:17
#8
Smidtia conspersa looks very good to me! The coppery coloured scuttelum matches too. That would be a good record as there are not many here, and as often is the case only recorded further south than I am, but Chris will possibly have more records.
Thanks Theo!B)
Posted by Jaakko on 29-12-2009 21:20
#9
Now when Theo said it, it's obvious... I was somehow ignoring that
Phorocera have facial bristles too! Plus that
P. obscura were really common this spring everywhere.
There seems to be 3 dc, so rules out
amoena. Phenology also matches.
Posted by blowave on 29-12-2009 21:29
#10
Thanks for the confirmation Jaakko, nice to know that the details match to you too. S. conspera is the only species we have here so it looks like a positive for sure!
Chris might want to add this one to the list I sent.;)