Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Tachinidae Campylochaeta praecox?

Posted by blowave on 25-12-2009 18:45
#1

Hi,

I need to get all my Tachinids or Tachinid look-alikes with a confirmed ID so I can send the records to Chris. Any help is much appreciated, but some of these are confusing as to which family they belong so please bear with me.;)

This one I got only one pic of on 14th April 2009 in my garden, a few miles south of Lincoln UK.

Greetings to all!

Janet :)

Posted by ChrisR on 26-12-2009 00:58
#2

Tricky - not a sarco this time (hairy eyes) but not Campylocheta either ... but not sure what it could be because I can't see enough of the body :( (maybe Phorocera?? - guess)

Here is a C.praecox that I had confirmed here recently :)

Edited by ChrisR on 26-12-2009 01:03

Posted by blowave on 26-12-2009 01:48
#3

I have cropped down to maximum magnification making two more pics which might help.

Posted by blowave on 26-12-2009 01:49
#4

bottom

Posted by Jaakko on 28-12-2009 21:32
#5

Phorocera gets my vote as well. It is difficult to see, but the m-vein seems to make a kink?

Posted by blowave on 28-12-2009 22:26
#6

Thanks Jaakko, if it's Phorocera sp. then it would narrow the choices down to two as we only have Phorocera obscura and P. assimilis in the UK.:)

Posted by Zeegers on 28-12-2009 22:56
#7

The facial ridge seems bare and the parafacialia hairy, if you have a very good look.

So my guess is Smidtia conspersa.


Theo

Posted by blowave on 28-12-2009 23:17
#8

Smidtia conspersa looks very good to me! The coppery coloured scuttelum matches too. That would be a good record as there are not many here, and as often is the case only recorded further south than I am, but Chris will possibly have more records.

Thanks Theo!B)

Posted by Jaakko on 29-12-2009 21:20
#9

Now when Theo said it, it's obvious... I was somehow ignoring that Phorocera have facial bristles too! Plus that P. obscura were really common this spring everywhere.

There seems to be 3 dc, so rules out amoena. Phenology also matches.

Posted by blowave on 29-12-2009 21:29
#10

Thanks for the confirmation Jaakko, nice to know that the details match to you too. S. conspera is the only species we have here so it looks like a positive for sure!

Chris might want to add this one to the list I sent.;)