Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Parasitic 'ptera

Posted by finklez on 21-07-2009 10:37
#1

First species was found on Agrius convolvuli, Hawk-moth larva, on december, israel.
*edit*, size should be about 1cm.

I just ran into this site, suggesting some parasitoids.
http://tpittaway..../a_con.htm

Edited by finklez on 21-07-2009 10:44

Posted by finklez on 21-07-2009 10:41
#2

Second is a parasitic wasp? found on Papilio machaon, Old World Swallowtail larva, June, Israel.
*edit* size about 3mm.

thanks

Edited by finklez on 21-07-2009 10:46

Posted by jorgemotalmeida on 21-07-2009 10:46
#3

second photo shows a Pteromalidae wasp.

the former seems to be a Sarcophagid. red traffic eyes!

Posted by finklez on 21-07-2009 11:36
#4

Few sites connects the Pteromalus sp. and especially Pteromalus puparum to parasite the papilio sp. larva

Pteromalus puparum (L.) regularly reared from P. machaon and known to have a host range spanning several families

www.informaworld....15WP6X.pdf, sadly i can't read the whole doc. only bits from google.

I guess it's safe to say it's Pteromalus sp.?

any chance for a genus on the Sarcophagid?

Posted by ChrisR on 21-07-2009 12:12
#5

The fly is definitely not a sarcophagid (there is a subscutellum) and it looks more like a Sturmia bella (or related member of the tribe Sturmiini). I would guess that it isn't exactly Sturmia bella though because the host and the behaviour is all wrong - only the general appearance is right.

Really we need Theo to say whether it could be something specific to your region :)

PS: BTW, as a general rule we split threads into 1 species per thread - it makes it less confusing when people reply. Also, this area is for Diptera - Hymenoptera requests should go in the "Other insects" area :)

Edited by ChrisR on 21-07-2009 12:14

Posted by ChrisR on 21-07-2009 12:20
#6

As another thought, after having a look through some of my photos, some of the Drino spp. look a bit like that ... but it still needs Theo I think :)

Posted by finklez on 21-07-2009 12:38
#7

Is it possible that it's actually a Tachinidae as the site i linked suggested?
they note 3 species:
Drino ciliata & atropivora
Masicera sphingivora

there are very few pics on the net, but anyway i couldn't tell one fly from another. :)
I understand that the Tachinids have enlarged postscutellum, but no idea how to id. it and if it can be seen from those photos..still learning..
found this usefull diagram on Wiki..u/l it in full size, mayb it will help others as well.
did some PP on it, still need some more.

Edited by finklez on 21-07-2009 12:39

Posted by finklez on 21-07-2009 12:43
#8

ChrisR wrote:
PS: BTW, as a general rule we split threads into 1 species per thread - it makes it less confusing when people reply. Also, this area is for Diptera - Hymenoptera requests should go in the "Other insects" area :)


I understand, no problem ;)

Posted by jorgemotalmeida on 21-07-2009 12:46
#9

another pitfall... Drino!

Posted by tim worfolk on 21-07-2009 13:04
#10

Hi Finklez, can't help with the ID - I'm a novice myself - but here's the post-scutellum.... your photo edited, hope you don't mind.

Tim

Edited by tim worfolk on 21-07-2009 13:04

Posted by tim worfolk on 21-07-2009 13:06
#11

of course what I meant to say was 'sub-scutellum'!

Tim

Posted by ChrisR on 21-07-2009 13:06
#12

It's a nice diagram ... but it doesn't show the subscutellum ;) It is usually quite difficult to see on photos because it is a bulge hidden under the scutellum at the posterior of the thorax ... and often obscured by the wing when viewing laterally.

But with a little practice you will be able to spot tachinids because they have some features that make them distinct:
- they usually have strong/thick bristles (except for the ones that don't - like the phasiines ;))
- they have a bend in the median vein (except the few that don't - Ocytata palipes)
- they have a subscutellum (except the few that don't - Litophasia sp.) etc. :)

Tachinids can be confused with some muscids, nearly all sarcophagids, nearly all rhinophorids. It helps to know what the "usual suspects" in the other families look like ... and the tachinids are what's left over :)

Edited by ChrisR on 21-07-2009 13:08

Posted by Jaakko on 21-07-2009 21:43
#13

jorgemotalmeida wrote:
another pitfall... Drino!


Yes, the ocellar bristles seem to be reduced or missing. Drino atropivora or something exotic.

Jaakko

Posted by finklez on 22-07-2009 09:24
#14

thanks all, and ChrisR for the quick tachinids guide..:P

Posted by ChrisR on 22-07-2009 09:51
#15

Tim Worfolk wrote:
of course what I meant to say was 'sub-scutellum'!

Ahh, sub-scutellum ... post-scutellum ... the world of entomology is littered with multiple words for the same body part, depending on which key you are reading at the time ;) Luckily all tachinid keys stick to the same words for most of the essential parts and you just have to learn the ones that don't or just double-check on the key's opening diagrams :)

Nice photo enlargement BTW - it can be incredibly hard to get a photo of the subscutellum :)