Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Soldier Fly?

Posted by Bruce Marlin on 03-01-2005 03:44
#1

This fly has stumped me for a long time. The nearest image I can find is Stratiomys potamida at http://www.bioima...P39424.HTM
Am I close? Thanks for your help.

www.cirrusimage.com/phenomena/DCP_15046_ID1.JPG

www.cirrusimage.com/phenomena/DCP_15050_ID1.JPG

Posted by Paul Beuk on 03-01-2005 07:46
#2

Yes, Bruce, you are right. It is a soldier fly. Certainly Stratiomys or one of the related genera. I will dig into it.

Posted by Paul Beuk on 03-01-2005 08:01
#3

Okay, it is Stratiomys. The combination of the broad abdomen, shape of the antenna (club-shaped without terminal arista) and the presence of two strong spines on the scutellum virtually make it impossible for it to be something else. About 26 species in North America (in contrast to the meager four we have in the Netherlands...) make it difficult for me to say which one. The very conspicuous white hairs on the face make me wonder if it might be S. barbata ('barbata' is 'bearded') but you will need to get confirmation for that.

Posted by Bruce Marlin on 03-01-2005 20:39
#4

Wow, Thanks Paul. I thought I was on the right track. I wish I had gottem some lateral views, but these flies are very skittish and difficult to approach; sometimes I think the only time I get a good shot is when a fly is on its last legs or sick or drunk or something. B)

Oh, I forgot - are soldiers like the Syrphidae, if the eyes meet, it's a male?

Edited by Bruce Marlin on 03-01-2005 20:41

Posted by Gerard Pennards on 04-01-2005 00:11
#5

Hello Bruce,
To give a short and direct answer to the last question: YES! :D:D

Greetings

Posted by Paul Beuk on 04-01-2005 07:40
#6

And a short addition: In most cases! :p

Posted by Bruce Marlin on 04-01-2005 20:29
#7

Ha! Yes, there is nothing as invariable as variation.
Thanks, Gerard and Paul.

Now I'm reading up on these flies, and several sources (most notably the National Audubon Society Field Guide) declare this family of flies "sluggish and inactive." Yeah right. Try getting one to hold still for a portrait...

Posted by Paul Beuk on 04-01-2005 21:07
#8

Bruce Marlin wrote:
several sources (most notably the National Audubon Society Field Guide) declare this family of flies "sluggish and inactive." Yeah right. Try getting one to hold still for a portrait...

Just wait till the weather get nice and warm, the some can surprise you (as you noticed). :D