Posted by javanerkelens on 27-06-2008 20:38
#1
Hello forum,
I think it is a Helina reversio(female)....but I have a little doubt.
(because there is no anterodorsals on the fore tibia...)
Greatings Joke
Posted by Stephane Lebrun on 28-06-2008 08:28
#2
It could be (ad are probably not visible from this angle), but you know Helina is not an easy genus without have the specimen in hand (is radial setulose beneath, has scutellum hairs on underside, is there pd on basal 1/2 etc.).
Posted by javanerkelens on 28-06-2008 17:27
#3
is radial setulose beneath, has scutellum hairs on underside
Both are bare.....
(looked it up , under the micros..)
is there pd on basal 1/2 etc.).
On the mid en hind tibea there is a pd near the top..(basal?)
Greatings Joke
Edited by javanerkelens on 28-06-2008 17:33