Posted by blowave on 06-02-2012 22:29
#19
Stephane Lebrun wrote:
Sorry Janet, I don't understand any more of which fly we are talking, which is which ?
Photo 1,2,5, 6, 7, 11 : difficult to ID (OK some pictures show a small pd on t1, which P. erronea has rarely (but not never).
Photo 3, 4, 8, 9, 10 are likely Phaonia angelicae (because we can see pv on t2 or additional pd in basal part of t3).
Sorry if you're getting confused Stephane! I had mentioned for photos 3& 4 it was one I had named
P. angelicae, I posted it as a comparison when niels suggested it could be this or another.
Photo 10 I have also mentioned it as being
angelicae, the others I think are all the same fly but taken two days apart.