Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 16

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,950
· Newest Member: JeffersonA
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· libor00:15:14
· John Carr00:33:02
· smol00:54:26
· Mario Renden01:05:42
· evdb01:48:55
· weia01:57:14
· Liliane D02:03:11
· ESant02:09:51
· RE Niks02:22:06
· Nacho Cabellos02:25:04
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Miscellaneous :: The Lounge
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Studying Insects without Collecting?
GlassOWater
#1 Print Post
Posted on 12-10-2007 18:08
Member

Location: Israel
Posts: 117
Joined: 26.09.07

What is your opinion about collecting insects? Is it crucial for the study of them?

I don't collect insects because I'd rather have the living one with no name, than a dead one with a name.
 
jorgemotalmeida
#2 Print Post
Posted on 12-10-2007 18:41
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9296
Joined: 05.06.06

it is crucial in many cases because to get a reliable ID you need, of course, a specimen to check genitalia. Or to observe some features when an expert ask for that. For me, it was very useful to have specimens to check correctly the ID. If you *really* wants/care about knowing the correct ID species, it is necessary to have specimen in many cases.
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
firefly
#3 Print Post
Posted on 12-10-2007 19:34
Member

Location: Lisbon,Portugal
Posts: 36
Joined: 12.10.07

To protect some species we need to know what they are, because a rare specie may be similar to a common one. Sometimes only cheking genitalia and other aspects we have a final and correct veridict.
I?m studying Lampyridae and other bioluminescent beings, and ?poor of me? if I couldn?t get samples for ADN studies, for ID studies,for behaviour studies, etc,etc... And fortunately I don?t need to kill them, I just keep them, and then when they die, I will study their body structures.
This is much more ecollogical than most people think.Smile
Edited by firefly on 12-10-2007 19:36
 
jorgemotalmeida
#4 Print Post
Posted on 12-10-2007 20:11
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9296
Joined: 05.06.06

another Portuguese! Smile Bem-vindo ? lista. Smile
I have a suspect of the real name. Smile
Edited by jorgemotalmeida on 12-10-2007 20:12
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
Kahis
#5 Print Post
Posted on 12-10-2007 21:31
User Avatar

Member

Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1999
Joined: 02.09.04

Well, yes and no Smile Depends on how and why you study them Smile

For almost all flies you need a collected specimens if you want to be really sure of the identification. *Good* photographs are often enough, but very few photographers know exactly what details must be visible for each family/genus/species.

Nearly all diptera identification books are written by taxonomists for taxonomists; they care little of field identification. In fact most species are probably identifiable in the field, but nobody has the skills needed.

Personally I don't think twice of collecting a fly. After all, driving to the study site on a hot day probably kllls more insects than collecting there. But I try to kill the collected flies as quickly and kindly as possible. In my opinion recording species *and* publishing the records on the net & reporting to authorities responsible for nature protection makes collecting morally acceptable.
Kahis
 
www.iki.fi/kahanpaa
conopid
#6 Print Post
Posted on 13-10-2007 10:32
User Avatar

Member

Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1039
Joined: 02.07.04

It is quite possible to study insects without collecting them, but you have to choose insects that do not need microscopic examination to identify them. Most butterflies and macro-moths, grasshoppers and crickets can be field identified with practice. Even some more critical groups can be studied purely in the field, as long as you accept that there will be many species which you will not be able to identify. But if you fancied studying hoverflies, you could choose to study Eristalis, Volucella, Criorhina for example, most of which can be identified in the field by capture, inspection and release.

In general though I would not be concerned about killing insects. The adult phase of most insects is very short lived in any case. It is really just a stage, whose only purpose is to mate and reproduce. It has lived 90%+ of its life, by the time you capture it. Often, a quick death caused by an entomologist may be far more merciful than deaths that nature deals out - dissolved and sucked dry by spiders, paralysed by wasps and slowly eaten alive, devoured from within by a parasite etc.

The contribution to knowledge, that taking a specimen makes is immense. The conservation of many species is absolutely reliant on our knowing what they are and where they live. In most cases some specimens have to be taken to be sure of such details. So, yes, collecting is absolutely an acceptable practice. Only the mass collecting of specimens for commercial purposes, or to display pretty series of variations should be condemned, as this contributes very little to science and conservation.

Personally, like the vast majority of entomologists, if I am confident of an insects ID in the field, I will always release it, if it is not essential to have a voucher specimen.
Nigel Jones, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom
 
jorgemotalmeida
#7 Print Post
Posted on 13-10-2007 11:24
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9296
Joined: 05.06.06

conopid wrote:
In general though I would not be concerned about killing insects. The adult phase of most insects is very short lived in any case. It is really just a stage, whose only purpose is to mate and reproduce. It has lived 90%+ of its life, by the time you capture it. Often, a quick death caused by an entomologist may be far more merciful than deaths that nature deals out - dissolved and sucked dry by spiders, paralysed by wasps and slowly eaten alive, devoured from within by a parasite etc.



and now... there is a crescent interest in entomological gastronomy!! Frown

I can imagine some dishes: (i hope to not hurt any feelings.. no, I prefer my fried ants Grin, never my dear flies!!)

Flies with champignons...
Fried Lucilia with fried potatoes.
Stewed Volucella(s) with chestnuts.
Sarcophaga larvae (very rich in proteins) can be added in Bolognaise spaghetti. Smile (instead parmesan cheese)
Boiled sciomyzids with vegetables and eggs (of sciomyzids of course)


If you desire, open your imagination to do your favorite dishes... Frown lol

ps this doesnt add anything to the thread. just for relaxing. hmm, flies never stressed us, just for relaxing even more, ok? Smile
Edited by jorgemotalmeida on 13-10-2007 11:28
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
dipdip
#8 Print Post
Posted on 13-10-2007 15:57
User Avatar

Member

Location: Thunersee Switzerland
Posts: 356
Joined: 17.12.05

I see, next time Jorge needs money to buy a new camera he'll write a book: "How to loos kilos - the Lucilla-diet" and when this doesn't help anymore, volume 2:"With soldierflies against your fat".
 
Susan R Walter
#9 Print Post
Posted on 13-10-2007 16:20
User Avatar

Member

Location: Touraine du Sud, central France
Posts: 1794
Joined: 14.01.06

Maja

For goodness sake - don't encourage him! Grin
Susan
 
http://loirenature.blogspot.com/
dipdip
#10 Print Post
Posted on 13-10-2007 16:20
User Avatar

Member

Location: Thunersee Switzerland
Posts: 356
Joined: 17.12.05

[Kahis wrote:

Nearly all diptera identification books are written by taxonomists for taxonomists; they care little of field identification. In fact most species are probably identifiable in the field, but nobody has the skills needed.
]

So why not start with spezies that are identificable in the field or from pictures? I tried it for instance with Eristalis. First I thought it hopless but this year I made some pictureseries: One animal from all possible sides, then when I lost it a picture of the ground and next trial. Many pictures go to the bin because I cann't identify them, but there is a rest. For instance Eristalis jugorum is for me normally impossible to identify from one picture (there are exeptions) but when you have sevral views there is a chance. When you know what exactly is important for ID, you can look for it ...
When you start collecting you are soon surrounded of dusty bodies and need much place. Untill now I have prefered to buy another harddisc instead of boxes for dead flies.
I don't know how long, but I still try to do as much as I can with pictures.
Maja
 
firefly
#11 Print Post
Posted on 13-10-2007 18:01
Member

Location: Lisbon,Portugal
Posts: 36
Joined: 12.10.07

jorgemotalmeida wrote:
another Portuguese! Smile Bem-vindo ? lista. Smile
I have a suspect of the real name. Smile


Obrigado pelas boas vindas! Thanks for the welcome!
CoolSmile
 
Nikita Vikhrev
#12 Print Post
Posted on 13-10-2007 20:15
User Avatar

Member

Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 9204
Joined: 24.05.05

I have funny experiens about
entomological gastronomy

Cambogia, Jan 2006. My friend Odonatologist Oleg Kosterin and me take some meal - there were fried locust with small amount of another Arthropoda and a chinese sticks to eat it. Conversation:
Me: Oleg, it seems to my that this Hemiptera is interesting and undamaged, doesn't it?
Oleg: Yes Nikita, put it please in my jar with alcohol instead of your mouth.
Me: OK
Nikita Vikhrev attached the following image:


[148.26Kb]
Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University
 
jorgemotalmeida
#13 Print Post
Posted on 14-10-2007 12:16
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9296
Joined: 05.06.06

Nikita, which flies did you see in Cambodja?? I suppose Diopsidae, Micropezidae, Celyphidae... Smile

Maja, if I wrote a book about diets would be about "how to win weight with flies diet for (some) models..." Pfft
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
jorgemotalmeida
#14 Print Post
Posted on 14-10-2007 12:19
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9296
Joined: 05.06.06

I agree totally with Kahis.
In field, I tried to reach species level, but many times I managed to get only genus level . Smile
It is not an easy task, but it is possible to reach a level that enables us to get species level. I think a 20x loup would be a great tool in the field to see fine details on the fly.
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
Nikita Vikhrev
#15 Print Post
Posted on 14-10-2007 15:12
User Avatar

Member

Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 9204
Joined: 24.05.05

Nikita, which flies did you see in Cambodja?? I suppose Diopsidae, Micropezidae, Celyphidae...

Indeed very few flies at all for several reasons:

1. It was the trip when I collected first flies in my life...
2. It isn't the best coutry for entomological research for many reasons - see attached image Shock
3. Enought? Wink
Nikita
Nikita Vikhrev attached the following image:


[134.21Kb]
Edited by Nikita Vikhrev on 14-10-2007 15:23
Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University
 
ChrisR
#16 Print Post
Posted on 14-10-2007 15:53
User Avatar

Administrator

Location: Reading, England
Posts: 7699
Joined: 12.07.04

Kahis made some very good points but I'd add that really an identification is only as good as its accurancy. If you're just mildly curious then you can decide on what lengths you want to go to to reach a good identification because nobody will ever check it and you won't pass it on to anyone else. But if you intend to give the record to a recording scheme then it's your responsibility to make sure the identification is accurate otherwise the scheme will "polluted" with inaccuracy and the maps it produces will not be respected by organisations that need to use the data for local planning decisions.

I think most photo or field identifications (even of common species) also have to be judged less certain than idents made from specimens. Not just because the whole fly couldn't be examined properly but also because it is hard/impossible to double-check them later. Often scientific opinion will change and species will be split or reworked so that it needs even closer examination (eg. genitalia) and if a specimen was taken then it can be reexamined.

It's always possible to study the species that are easy to field-identify but this soon becomes a bit boring and the more curious amongst us was to delv a little deeper and find out what else we have living near us Smile
 
http://tachinidae.org.uk
ChrisR
#17 Print Post
Posted on 14-10-2007 15:58
User Avatar

Administrator

Location: Reading, England
Posts: 7699
Joined: 12.07.04

Nikita is demonstrating "hardcore" entomology Wink It's one thing to brave Malaria, Dysentery and the occasional snake bite ... but dodging landmines is only for the very toughest dipterist!! Grin
 
http://tachinidae.org.uk
javig
#18 Print Post
Posted on 14-10-2007 17:36
User Avatar

Member

Location: Spain
Posts: 222
Joined: 21.04.07

Kahis wrote:

Nearly all diptera identification books are written by taxonomists for taxonomists; they care little of field identification. In fact most species are probably identifiable in the field, but nobody has the skills needed.



I agree.
 
http://nature.photography.dered.net/
GlassOWater
#19 Print Post
Posted on 14-10-2007 17:42
Member

Location: Israel
Posts: 117
Joined: 26.09.07

This is a very nice discussion for two reasons:
1. You all raise good points and explain them thoroughly.
2. It didn't start a flame war.

It actually made me change my opinion (Also happened to be that I found about 20 different species in my home in the last few days, so there's another reason). For now I lack the needed equipment, and I'm starting my military service very soon, but I might start collecting when I'll be back. Grin

Keep this thread going!
 
pierred
#20 Print Post
Posted on 14-10-2007 20:18
User Avatar

Member

Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 1413
Joined: 21.04.05

Nikita Vikhrev wrote:
Oleg: Yes Nikita, put it please in my jar with alcohol instead of your mouth.


Does he always drink alcohol from jars, not from glasses?
Just curious...
Pierre Duhem
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Insects on Window Diptera (adults) 2 22-03-2023 09:24
Fresh water insects Other insects, spiders, etc. 3 27-10-2021 20:17
looking for forums for ID other ordes of insects Other insects, spiders, etc. 4 26-01-2021 08:19
Tiny insects on a moth's wing Other insects, spiders, etc. 3 14-01-2019 11:35
Help with Cecidomyiidae gall insects What should I use? 6 06-02-2018 06:21
Date and time
28 March 2024 20:31
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

07.03.24 00:01
Some flies preserved in ethanol and then pinned often get the eyes sunken, how can this be avoided? Best answer: I usually keep alcohol-collected material in alcohol

17.08.23 15:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 13:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 13:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 11:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 08:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 21:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

27.12.22 21:10
Thanks, Jan Willem! Much appreciated. Grin

19.12.22 11:33
Thanks Paul for your work on keeping this forum available! Just made a donation via PayPal.

09.10.22 17:07
Yes, dipterologists from far abroad, please buy your copy at veldshop. Stamps will be expensive, but he, the book is unreasonably cheap Smile

Render time: 2.75 seconds | 189,863,563 unique visits