Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 12

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,953
· Newest Member: Adam Poole
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· weia< 5 mins
· Volker00:13:27
· Arthur van O...01:00:44
· RamiP01:11:06
· evdb01:50:59
· Juergen Peters08:03:03
· exonie09:32:46
· smol09:38:58
· Mario Renden10:21:22
· kevin_cheng10:23:14
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Lasiomma sp. ? --> correct, probably
gertvanheghe
#1 Print Post
Posted on 10-12-2017 17:54
Member

Location: Belgium
Posts: 1722
Joined: 20.05.12

waarnemingen.be/fotonew/9/15393749.jpg

https://waarnemin.../145772529

Thank you!
Gert
Edited by gertvanheghe on 11-12-2017 20:48
 
javanerkelens
#2 Print Post
Posted on 10-12-2017 20:08
User Avatar

Member

Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2962
Joined: 18.10.07

If indeed photographed on 3 november, it could be Lasiomma.
The most common one is L. seminitidum and still active in late autum....even during the winter. Just keep it as a possible Lasiomma species

Johanna
 
gertvanheghe
#3 Print Post
Posted on 10-12-2017 21:08
Member

Location: Belgium
Posts: 1722
Joined: 20.05.12

Thanks, Johanna. However, the photo was made 11th of March...
 
javanerkelens
#4 Print Post
Posted on 10-12-2017 21:50
User Avatar

Member

Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2962
Joined: 18.10.07

Hmmm…..when I see your date on Waarneming.be, then this does not match the actual date of photographing this fly?.
If so…..then the input is scientifically not correct.
When we than search for the occurrence of certain types of flies in the database, we get some strange results ……in my humble opinion.

Johanna
Edited by javanerkelens on 10-12-2017 23:01
 
gertvanheghe
#5 Print Post
Posted on 11-12-2017 13:58
Member

Location: Belgium
Posts: 1722
Joined: 20.05.12

This is terribly confusing!

My observation is from the 11th of March this year.
On Waarnemingen.be the date seems to be always written in the ISO 8601 standard date format "YYYY-MM-DD", so it should be 2017-03-11.
And "2017-03-11" is exactly what I see on the website; screenshot attached.

What is it that "does not match" ? I don't see it !?

Thanks!
Gert
gertvanheghe attached the following image:


[111.97Kb]
Edited by gertvanheghe on 11-12-2017 17:43
 
javanerkelens
#6 Print Post
Posted on 11-12-2017 17:59
User Avatar

Member

Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2962
Joined: 18.10.07

My mistake.....I read it as YYYY-DD-MM instead of YYYY-MM-DD


Johanna
Edited by javanerkelens on 11-12-2017 18:00
 
gertvanheghe
#7 Print Post
Posted on 11-12-2017 20:48
Member

Location: Belgium
Posts: 1722
Joined: 20.05.12

No problem. I'm glad it's all clear now!
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Anthomyiidae: Lasiomma strigilatum ? Diptera (adults) 6 12-04-2023 20:04
Platycheirus ambiguus (male) ? -> correct Syrphidae 5 04-04-2023 19:41
Anthomyiidae NL male->Lasiomma anthomyinum Diptera (adults) 3 17-06-2022 12:19
Empididae: Rhamphomyia erythrophthalma? --> correct Diptera (adults) 7 07-10-2021 09:21
Is Stevenia a correct identification? Diptera (adults) 3 14-06-2021 17:08
Date and time
19 April 2024 08:59
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

07.03.24 00:01
Some flies preserved in ethanol and then pinned often get the eyes sunken, how can this be avoided? Best answer: I usually keep alcohol-collected material in alcohol

17.08.23 15:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 13:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 13:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 11:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 08:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 21:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

27.12.22 21:10
Thanks, Jan Willem! Much appreciated. Grin

19.12.22 11:33
Thanks Paul for your work on keeping this forum available! Just made a donation via PayPal.

09.10.22 17:07
Yes, dipterologists from far abroad, please buy your copy at veldshop. Stamps will be expensive, but he, the book is unreasonably cheap Smile

Render time: 0.86 seconds | 191,207,836 unique visits